Quote:
Originally Posted by JonInMiddleGA
Yep. But that isn't the specific conflict of interest that concerns me most.
My concern stems more specifically from the fact that he's got a steady partner/regular companion. Having him rule on this particular subject which could have direct impact on his own personal life seems a bit much. Any notion of impartiality flew out the window with that bit of info afaic.
|
by that definition you'd have to have a celibate (preferred) or at least single judge ruling on that to avoid impartiality.
the legal basis of his opinion is extremely sound. you're just pissed off because he didn't rule the way you would have liked him too.