Quote:
Originally Posted by Ksyrup
The biggest question I have is - if he truly died, why would they go out of their way to give all those clues about it? Wouldn't you want to hide that from the public, not secretly flaunt it like a serial killer or something (BTK comes to mind)? That points directly to it being a marketing thing. I just don't get the motivation for all of the evidence they claim to have, if he really died.
|
This is what makes the 'Paul is Dead' conspiracy particularly stupid IMO. The theory is based entirely on the hopelessly retarded concept that Beatles and various evil promoters putting up an immediate, convoluted and elaborate cover story that involved look-a-likes, a massive concerted media cover up....and purposefully inserting several completely obvious and simple lyrical and visual clues to that effect, onto an album(s) guaranteed to sell to tens of millions of copies to the general public, across the world.