Quote:
Originally Posted by MrBug708
Eh, that's what I meant, didnt they vote against expanding? (With obvious reference to TAMU)
|
But they did make the comment that they may consider future options. Didn't see any language like that in the Pac-XX statement.
The interesting part is that this essentially was a rebuff of Texas. They refused to get where they needed to be, so the Pac-XX said no. The possibilities of OU/OSU/MU/KU looking at the Pac-XX are now back open with UT out of the picture. Also opens up the OU/OSU/MU/A&M package to SEC that has circulated today if they don't get what they want from UT, which appears to be huge concessions at this point.