Quote:
Originally Posted by Mizzou B-ball fan
Why wouldn't I? Mizzou is a proud member of the B12 for one more year. After that, I have little reason to root for any other conference/team than the SEC/Mizzou.
|
Heaven help the SEC if these are examples of being a 'proud member of the conference'.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mizzou B-ball fan
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mizzou B-ball fan
Interesting how different the reporting on the WVU/UL situation is. KC Star is reporting that the hangup on the situation is yet another OU/UT fight. OU wants UL over WVU. Texas is saying just the opposite and neither want to budge.
Also rumors on Rivals that OU is threatening to jump to SEC over the matter.
Mizzou can't get out of this clusterf%#@ quick enough.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mizzou B-ball fan
Boy, the Texas 'well-placed sources' have gone from wrong to laughably delusional at this point..........
Austin sports news and Longhorns | Statesman.com
Even if we go with what most would agree is relatively even terms on the athletic end, the loss of Mizzou with a replacement of West Virginia is a large downgrade to the Big 12 from an academic perspective. The move of Mizzou to the SEC would mean that the conference that generally has a weak academic reputation would have the same number of AAU universities as the Big 12 and a higher average academic rating than the Big 12.
How out of touch is this 'administrator'? MU's Deaton made it perfectly clear in his statements last Friday that any decision to move would mean MU would be playing elsewhere next year. These admins in the Big 12 seem to be taking the Dan Beebe approach to the situation. Just keep saying things that are contrary to what is actually happening in the hopes that it will somehow make those statements happen. |
__________________
Thinkin' of a master plan
'Cuz ain't nuthin' but sweat inside my hand
So I dig into my pocket, all my money is spent
So I dig deeper but still comin' up with lint
Last edited by cartman : 11-08-2011 at 02:07 PM.
|