Quote:
Originally Posted by HiFiRevival
Several people have already pointed out basic things that show you clearly have no fucking clue about this case and are contradicting your own approach to things with far less evidence to support them.
There was nothing to the Duke case. The moment things became publicly available it was extremely clear it was some idiot hooker trying to make a buck off of some stupid college kids.
This, on the other hand, is a case of a piece of shit covering the tracks of his pedophile friend, and there's quite a bit to support that. If you can't see the difference in what is known already, you're stupid enough to go to the chair in Georgia.
|
Ok, and what about people saying Paterno condoned rape, should have done way more, and was only covering up tracks for his friend? We have not heard anything from him or that he knew what exactly was happening. Do you really think Paterno would just shrug his shoulders if he was told Sandusky was raping a 10 year-old? Is that what people honestly think happened? Granted the case against Sandusky is not like the duke case, but the case against Paterno is.