Quote:
Originally Posted by CrimsonFox
just who are you trying to convince of what here? Sounds like you've already proven ZImmerman innocent. Sure devil's advocate and all that but come on.
|
In the post you quoted I said I thought that two possibilities involving the yelling were plausible, and I expressed a desire that the identify on the voice could be revealed scientifically. Is that really the one you take offense to or is it some other post?
I am a little bit of a contrarian, I admit. But I don't get why I'm the one who has "already proven" anything when its seems to me most everyone else seems know exactly what happened (and knows everything about the law and criminal procedure). I've tried to qualify almost every thought I've expressed with what I don't know or don't understand. And I haven't expressed a lot of opinions at all, let alone make assumptions based on other assumptions based on stuff I just made up (which I need to get over chiming in on, yes).