|
Just catching up on WAS/HOU, where Edwin Jackson had a rocky first (but has settled down some). Locally they've been saying for a while how much improved the Nats rotation has been, to the extent that John Lannan - who in some years might have been at the top of their rotation - has totally squeezed out.
Jackson has been cited as being a big part of this and they seem high on him, but I keep wondering - are they overestimating his ability? Or is he better than I think he is?
__________________
null
|