Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveMax58
Well, I do believe you draft the BPA at a position that isn't overstocked already, but the BPA (in my view) has a sliding scale based on position & risk. I know the risk is less now than before but I also see the risk in passing over a player that can help you for 10+ years rather than 3-5 and hope for an intangible longevity that isn't typical of the position.
I'm not saying a RB is never worth taking that high. I guess I just follow the thinking that a great QB can make an avg line/RB appear to perform better, a great line can make an avg QB/RB appear to perform better, but a great RB canNOT make an avg QB/line appear to perform better.
So of the 3, the RB is the most ineffectual for the other 2.
|
I follow. I just think of it as one of those things where everyone states the same mantra and it results in an over-correction. Kind of like how a bunch of people can say "Player X is so underrated"...fast forward a few months and suddenly, he's overrated (h/t to Simmons).