Quote:
Originally Posted by henry296
I think I know what happened with my team. I was only 2-2 against top 50 teams.
|
That is what I was going to look at as far as your team in comparison to other teams. The seeding process cares more about who exactly your team beat than the RPI rating does.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by henry296
Does the decision to transfer logic consider future playing time? In my last season I had two big men declare for the draft and then 2 of my back-up big men who understandably didn't play much and were unhappy and decided to transfer. A fifth big man graduated so I'm left with 0 C/PF since I wasn't very successful in recruiting one.
|
The game does a bad job here. Players transfer due to unhappiness from the previous season even if they would be starters the next season.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by henry296
Another idea is to have a group of people who don't committ until the very end. I think IRL there is a November and April signing period, so maybe no mid-season committments or make them verbal committments that can be changed. I'm sure some big men would be willing to come to my 65 prestige school that has been to three straight NCAA tournaments with only 15 losses in 3 years.
|
When I get to working on a new version recruiting will get a bit of an overhaul. This sort of thing would be part of that.