Quote:
Originally Posted by ISiddiqui
Are you really? Because I really don't think you are. Half-joking at best.
|
The fact that you read this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by flere-imsaho
Trust me, I get that. And to be fair I'm sure Ryan ardently believes this. However, at what point do you look at decades of evidence that your legislative philosophy does not produce its intended result and think to revise your philosophy?
Ryan clearly believes in a work-life balance. He clearly gives perks along these lines to his staff. Unless he's completely uninterested in the welfare (along these lines) of the general public (which seems unlikely, given his actions), why hew to such a consistent line against such legislation? Hypocrisy? Legislative Purity? Naivete?
|
But then choose to believe this:
Especially when I then write this:
Quote:
My serious reply to your question is contained in my response to Imran earlier in this post. Which, honestly, I shouldn't have to articulate, since I kind of think it's the common-sense response to my objections to Ryan's actions in this matter.
|
Says more about you than it does about me.