|
For a judge to rule against Ivey here, it just seems like he must not have understood the general framework of casino gambling. Unless the reporting here and elsewhere has missed major elements, I come down very solidly with Ivey -- he asked for absurd but specific accommodations, they accepted them, and then he used them to gain an advantage against the house. That seems totally different than just walking into a house and using some slick sleight-of-hand cheating method to defraud the house.
|