View Single Post
Old 02-27-2017, 01:35 PM   #24
AENeuman
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: SF
Quote:
Originally Posted by TroyF View Post

But we "exclude" people all the time for all sorts of reasons. Want to play golf at Augusta? Good luck with that. You'd better have a crapload of money, be the right gender (or married to one) and for the most part you had better be the right color.


Having an adoption agency and wanting to pick the type of parents you want? I don't know.

Very well said. I would just add that in golf you have to have a score to qualify. Foster parents too have to qualify. And Obergefell concluded that sexual orientation does not prevent one from being a good parent. So, for the religious institutions to deny same sex foster care would be to exclude the well qualified applicants for something that has nothing to do in being a well qualified applicant.

I think this also carries over to the specif topic here. There needs to be an legal/rational/scientific understanding about who who is a well qualified male/female. Therefore, any other exclusion, segregation can be seen as a moral act, rather than legal.
AENeuman is offline   Reply With Quote