[Flasch186]

Originally Posted by John Galt

Arles, why do you continue in these political debates continue to ask people produce evidence of things that aren't the issue? No one is saying he changed the data. People are saying he changed the conclusions of the data (and you don't seem to have ever looked at a climate change report - it isn't like it is a few paragraphs, followed by spreadsheets - the data is integrated and interpreted in the text). Continuing to say, "but he didn't change the data," is a non-sequitor.

Here is the whisteblower statement that outlines the long-standing problems that go beyond Cooney's edits:

hxxp://209.200.93.225/doc/Memo%20to%20Superiors.pdf

It's funny. I'm a big believer that the human-to-warming link is only partially understood and often exaggerated, but what the administration is doing on this issue is indefensible whether you believe in global warming or not.

thank you