|
I mean, if the logic is that you believe a car is secure because he should expect people to follow the law, then the logic would also suggest that banks (stores, whatever) should expect people to also follow the law and not have security.
Or that in the same instance, he should consider his locked house secure and not require a gun to protect it. If you believe that you need a gun to secure your house - which many do - then you shouldn't hold the belief that your car is secure (unless you are in it with said gun, or watching it 24/7).
In any event, Beto did not to my knowledge say that you couldn't have a gun to protect your home (or car). Just that you don't need an AK-47 or an AR-15 to do so.
__________________
null
|