|
We had these positions
1 Gk
2 DC
1 DR/DL
2 ML/AML
3 DMC/MC
1 ST
That sounds like one of the modern variants of a 4-5-1. We could do a 4-2-3-1 with two DMCs.
Our three loanees are on first team or key players and are these positions:
AMC
AMRL
DL
Makes sense
Now I don’t like our fullback much and our other good one is a loaner.
Am I looking to go to my 3-5-2 again? Or the 3-1-2-1-2 rather?
I take a look at the rest of the league –
4231 – 7
4-3-2-1 - 2
4-4-2 – 4
4-4-2 Diamond with two middle sin the middle rather than on the wings - 3
3-4-3 – 2 (It’s more of a 3-4-2-1 with the normal strikers split out wide in AM roles)
4-2-2-2 – 1 (With two DMCs instead of MCs)
They tell me that they used the 4-2-3-1 last year and it didn’t work well.
What do I want to do?
They have 7 teams out of 20 with two forwards which feels a bit high in today’s game.
So what about me?
Let’s look at two tactics.
My 3-1-2-1-2
I would start these:
Gk Costil
DC Holding, Isimat – need 3rd DC
DMC Otavio
MC Lerager OR Natcho
ML Mehmedi
MR - ???
AMC - ???
ST - ???
In this role I need a DC, AMC, MR, and two STs
What if I did a 4-2-3-1?
GK Costil
DC Holding, Isimat
DR ???
DL ???
MC Otavio and Lerager or Natcho
AML Mehmedi
AMR ???
AMC ???
ST ???
I would need DR, DL, AMR, AMC, and ST.
I need five players each way.
I commit to my 3-5-2 variant. I head over to tactics
|