Quote:
Originally Posted by molson
It's only "peeking ahead" in terms of probable performance on the field, by using the ratings for the players. A human player can do the same thing, but we'd typically rather actually see a player suck on the field before we pull him, rather than see his ratings drop first and not let him back on the field.
|
I can't justify some of the AI decisions I am seeing using this logic. What I am seeing is players lose 3-4% of their talent/ratings- noticeable- but not significant- and certainly not grounds for a trip to the bench or AAA- which is exactly where they end up. This issue is further exacerbated by the AI's decision to replace said player with a clearly inferior one- even using it's own measurement system. I am not saying it's as prevalent as last year- I just can't fathom the algorithm that leads to these screwy decisions. It's almost like the AI cant' stand to leave things alone.