Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Qwikshot
Bob Dylan didn't enunciate so well either...so I would have to disagree...I didn't find all Nirvana worthwhile or substantial, but some of it was in what it did and how it influenced the next generation...you cannot discount Nirvana and Cobain even if you didn't like him...or at least you shouldn't.
|
Nirvana and Cobain had
some good stuff, and were certainly influential. But they didn't come close to earning the level of reverance they have. Very very overrated.
They had a couple good albums and, like almost every other band in history, they would have followed them up with some mediocre albums to balance things out. Instead, Cobain offed himself and the band is held on a pedestal.
If Perry Ferrell had died after Nothing's Shocking, Jane's Addiction would be revered in the same light. Instead, they had a so-so album, broke up, formed bad side bands, put together a crappy leftovers album, and regrouped to put out a monstrously bad album. They are remembered as a band that had some great moments, but not one of the all time greats, and that's how Nirvana/Cobain would be remembered as well if he hadn't been such a coward.