|
Bk, you are a good coach, you think about chemistry more than most and your strategy never seems that bad.
Anyways. Claph, Anyone could be lucky but the larger sample size we have the less luck involved. I know 3 isnt much bigger than 1 but it is 3x the sample size.
Basically I just looked at duplicate scans and looked for simularities in the names or positions on the signup board, to see why each would have scanned that person. Clap was part of a triple scan, he was the only one that didnt fit that pattern based on position. This is very weak evidence and I dont even think we should vote for claph. You will find patterns wherever you look.
|