View Single Post
Old 09-11-2006, 01:31 PM   #185
Swaggs
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anxiety View Post
I didn't defend Lathum, I attacked you. You could have voted for anyone and I would have still voted for you. So, not only do you jump on someone who is not checked in early, but then you also misrepresent what I say. Seems fishy to me.

-Anxiety

I thought the vote was due last night and wasn't sure of my availability the rest of the day, so I voted for one of the handful of players who hadn't checked in yet. I explained why I voted for him in the post I voted in and, a few posts later, I acknowledged that I was confused about the deadline.

Why is that any more fishy than picking a name out of a hat, picking the hottest player, voting based on prior games' results, or any other useless reason to vote for someone on Day 1?

On the other hand, you attacking me for making a first vote against someone that had no votes up until that point, is fishy.
__________________
DOWN WITH HATTRICK!!!
The RWBL
Are you reading In The Bleachers?
Swaggs is offline   Reply With Quote