Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Edward64
She was unarmed but she was not in handcuff.
We are in the realm of whatabouts and having experienced the other side of it I don't want to be the instigator this time around. I'd just say there reasons where I'd find the actions the cops took as reasonable to restrain a person.
|
You are correct. She wasn't in handcuffs. She was however literally just standing there. When someone is just standing there, not trying to run away, not trying to do any aggressive action whatsoever, you hit them with the batons and they
still just stand there ...
No. There's no reason to keep hitting them. Doesn't matter what happened before. It's blatantly obvious they don't need force to restrain somewhere who, again,
is literally just standing there.