Front Office Football Central - View Single Post

Brian Swartz · 04-19-2016, 08:33 AM

Up his doubles at this point. I'm a little confused because I didn't think serve could be trained past 100, but you can use the trainer formula to decide what is better to train.

Example: currently takes 1332xp to train doubles. If needed serve xp is more than ((doubles / .33) * .75) -- which produces 3027, well under the 5486 listed -- then you want to train doubles before service. You can do similar math for comparing it to skill, etc.

Edit: You can't 'see' the raw numbers for players you don't have hired, but you can estimate it with some basic math. Doubles aren't affected by aging, so if a player has(for example), a 4.0 in doubles he's got about 80(multiply by 20). For skill and service, you multiply by 20 again and then divide by aging factor. So with the 68% aging, if a player had 4.0 skill, they would have about 80/.68 for their raw skill, or 117-118.

04-19-2016, 08:33 AM	#183
Brian Swartz Grizzled Veteran Join Date: May 2006	Up his doubles at this point. I'm a little confused because I didn't think serve could be trained past 100, but you can use the trainer formula to decide what is better to train. Example: currently takes 1332xp to train doubles. If needed serve xp is more than ((doubles / .33) * .75) -- which produces 3027, well under the 5486 listed -- then you want to train doubles before service. You can do similar math for comparing it to skill, etc. Edit: You can't 'see' the raw numbers for players you don't have hired, but you can estimate it with some basic math. Doubles aren't affected by aging, so if a player has(for example), a 4.0 in doubles he's got about 80(multiply by 20). For skill and service, you multiply by 20 again and then divide by aging factor. So with the 68% aging, if a player had 4.0 skill, they would have about 80/.68 for their raw skill, or 117-118. Last edited by Brian Swartz : 04-19-2016 at 08:35 AM.