Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexB
It’s not really any different to holding or PI though. A time limit is gonna be unenforceable unless you have one ref for each duel, which isn’t gonna happen.
Changing the wording to significant contact as suggested above would be a move in the right direction, but TBH is the opposite direction to where the game is going
|
Ok, change the wording to significant contact. It does not really address my point. bhlloy said that there are at least three fouls on every penalty. I ask two questions:
1. Should whatever players are currently doing that are deemed illegal on penalties actually be fouls? If they should not be considered fouls, change the law so they are not against the law.
2. If they are deemed against the law and it can be seen, do we want the match official and by extension VAR to call it and give the penalties?
__________________
"The blind soldier fought for me in this war. The least I can do now is fight for him. I have eyes. He hasn’t. I have a voice on the radio, he hasn’t. I was born a white man. And until a colored man is a full citizen, like me, I haven’t the leisure to enjoy the freedom that colored man risked his life to maintain for me. I don’t own what I have until he owns an equal share of it. Until somebody beats me and blinds me, I am in his debt."- Orson Welles August 11, 1946
|