Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan T
What do you have to tell you that an active participant is any more or less likely to be a bad guy than an inactive participant?
The benefit in my mind of voting off inactive participants at the beginning is that an active bad guy will leave some voting trail and discussion trail to use later in the game. An active good guy will help participate in discussion, try to find bad guys and keep up with the game.
When there isn't anything else to go on, I'd rather vote off the dead wood or look for people who are UtR.
|
there's statistically nothing to say that active vs. inactive has anything to do with good vs. bad, that's true. But with guys like the 3 who havn't checked in, wouldn't it make more sense to wait for replacements who might actually leave a trail and focus on day 1 discussion or whatever?