Check that. I'll just post it here.
Round | 10 year old draft | | 9 year old draft |
1 | Steelers | Bears | Bulldogs | Poli | | Poli | Bulldogs | Bears | Steelers |
2 | Poli | Bulldogs | Bears | Steelers | | Steelers | Bears | Bulldogs | Poli |
3 | Steelers | Bears | Bulldogs | Poli | | Poli | Bulldogs | Bears | Steelers |
4 | Poli | Bulldogs | Bears | Steelers | | Steelers | Bears | Bulldogs | Poli |
5 | Steelers | Bears | Bulldogs | Poli | | Poli | Bulldogs | Bears | Steelers |
6 | Poli | Bulldogs | Bears | Steelers | | Steelers | Bears | Bulldogs | Poli |
7 | Steelers | Bears | Bulldogs | Poli | | Poli | Bulldogs | Bears | Steelers |
8 | Poli | Bulldogs | Bears | Steelers | | Steelers | Bears | Bulldogs | Poli |
9 | Steelers | | | | | Poli | Bulldogs | Bears | Steelers |
It's a snake draft, picks in red are forfeited due to protecting a coach's son. This allows me two of the top remaining 10 year olds and the top 9 year old.
I can choose to protect two kids before the draft, as if they were my "coach's sons". If I were to do it, it might be with the 9 year olds. Sure, I have the top pick, so choosing the top kid there does nothing for me. However, choosing the 2nd best kid allows me the top 2 nine year olds. That would compliment my top two ten year olds well.
I don't see any reason to waste that on my ten year old selections, honestly.