Quote:
Originally Posted by JPhillips
Markus: I should clarify a couple of points. On the scouting issue it is a matter of potential ratings. I'm regularly seeing guys my scout has in the mid teens that SISA has in the mid single digits. For example the pitcher the AI drafted for me in the third round of the dispersal draft my scout had at 14/15/14 for potential and SISA had him at 5/6/5. He's just one example, but I'm finding them all over the league. The AI was also drafting guys early in the dispersal draft that had these kinds of discrepancies when I looked at other rosters with my scout's eyes. It's fine for this to happen occasionally, but when it's a regular occurance in the early rounds of the dispersal draft it seems to say that the scouting error between SISA and scouts is too great.
The salary problem is tied to the scouting problem. Because scouts see these 1/5 star guys as studs they're drafting them very early which I guess gives them a big salary. They aren't anywhere near ready to be MLB players, though, so they get sent to the minors. It's not that the decision to send them to the minors is bad, but it's not realistic to have guys making 5 mil playing in the minors. Two of the top three salaries on my team after the dispersal draft were pitching in the minors on Opening Day.
I hope staff develops like you say. I know they didn't in 2006 and I won't be playing long enough on the preview to find out.
As I said, this version looks much better than last year's.
|
SISA (just like your scouts) can be way off when players are very young and have no experience. That is by design.
This salary problem is this: Once the draft is over, the game assigns fictional contracts to the players and calculates the financials based on that. Now, when you have that young player on the active roster / 40 man roster instead of in the minors when the draft ends, he'll get a salary.