Quote:
Originally Posted by RainMaker
|
So, I make two investments:
1. I invest $10,000 in real estate and lose $1,000 (have $9K after 2020)
2. I invest $10,000 in Apple stock and make $2,000 (have $12K after 2020)
It's "not fair" that I pay a net capital gains tax on $1,000 based on the sum of my investments? In the above case, you would rather the investor pay taxes on the $2K but get no reduction in gains for the $1,000 he lost?
I know the "cost" numbers are what bother people, but I can't see an issue with the logic in it. Now, maybe some loopholes would need to be closed after seeing it in practice for a year - but this seems like a pretty nice change for any of us who own real estate (more investors = higher prices for properties).