[Flasch186]

Spoiler

It’s disingenuous because you lend credence to the idea that the contrived neutrality is the authentic part and not the attempt to wash out the lgbtq+ and then continue to drag out the drivel of equivalency and then spend hours defending the indefensible as if the legislation is anything but *phobic propaganda.

It isn’t

People are going to die because of it and there was never any true problem other then the crap one can drum up on the obscure one off article to scare the tribe into a a feeding frenzy.

It’s disingenuous of you. You’ve played both coins in subsequent arguments that you know the legislation was *phobic legislation, you support it on the one hand then want it to be cleaned up by the victims of the ridiculous grays in the areas and expense, risk, and pay, for a lawyer subsidized windfall all the while claiming to be misunderstood.

It’s gaslighting at it’s finest, goal post moving du jour, and it’ll queue up the next ☯️ post of being misunderstood, talking about something we aren’t talking about, not understanding what’s being said, and conflating a mix match off the buffet instead of just trying to the bottom of it and your feelings about those groomers.

Dont want to be suspended so I put this behind a Viewers choice html so you had to actually want to see it by clicking versus me putting it in your face

Sent from my iPhone using