|
The only way that this could be considered discrimination is if you can prove that their policy of hiring internal employees as opposed to contract employees has and adverse impact.
By this I mean that if 80% of the contract workers are minorities and 80% of the internal work force are not minorities, then you could argue that the policy itself is discriminatory. Even though the policy doesn't single out a protected group, it can still be discriminatory if it has this adverse impact.
However, if you're a white male under 40 without a disability or military service, you're pretty much fucked.
|