Quote:
Originally Posted by whomario
And i think this is a whole lot of "If" and overall this whole idea comes down to a) holding a high amount of inherent risk or b) being so watered down that you are basically implementing it for effect, for everybody to feel better having "done something".
|
I do think (b) is a fair possibility. However, I don't agree with (a), I don't think there is a high amount of inherent risk.
Unless the costs (and opportunity costs) are prohibitive, all things held equal, I would prefer the last line of defense vs not.