Quote:
|
Originally Posted by thesloppy
...for some folks, sure. You keep leaving off that crucial qualifier when talking about the hypothetial rational non-maskers.
|
I don't think that's a fair assessment. You're right that there are people who are in the anti-science category, but I wrote is that it's more complicated than that - not that those people don't exist. The people I'm describing aren't hypothetical at all. Some I know personally. Others are readily available with a simple search to anyone who is looking for them.
The thing I'm objecting to here is the repeated blanket anti-science characterization made by much of the board, a characterization that is at a minimum being applied with a brush that is demonstrably too broad.