Quote:
Originally Posted by Hell Atlantic
what's the point of that? so you can sit and laugh at how stupid his ending would have been?
unless i missed a memo, he isn't paid to write for the Sopranos. none of us are. it shouldn't be to us to do Chase's job. any one of us could create an ending for the series - that's not hard. the point isn't to come up with a better ending, its for Chase to have come up with an ending - period. big difference.
if i want art i'll go to a musuem. if i'm going to watch a story on tv i want that story to have an ending.
|
You are missing such a huge point it's ridiculous. Again, what is the ending that would adequately qualify as an "ending?"
I'll answer it for you...Tony dies. That's it. That's the sole storyline that would have given the show any sort of closure. All other options leave more questions in the air, and wouldn't be a complete ending. So your point then becomes, since Chase didn't intend to have Tony die when he started the series, his show was destined to be a failure in your eyes.