Q is 2. I'm glad we've got "suspects". Hopefully MSM will start scrutinizing these 2 guys, come out with more stuff, and more will come out.
But bottom-line. Did these 2 do anything that they can be charged with? I'm guessing no.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/19/t...s-authors.html
Quote:
Now two teams of forensic linguists say their analysis of the Q texts shows that Mr. Furber, one of the first online commentators to call attention to the earliest messages, actually played the lead role in writing them.
Sleuths hunting for the writer behind Q have increasingly overlooked Mr. Furber and focused their speculation on another QAnon booster: Ron Watkins, who operated a website where the Q messages began appearing in 2018 and is now running for Congress in Arizona. And the scientists say they found evidence to back up those suspicions as well. Mr. Watkins appears to have taken over from Mr. Furber at the beginning of 2018. Both deny writing as Q.
|
Quote:
|
At first most of the text is by Furber, said Mr. Cafiero, who works at the French National Center for Scientific Research. But the signature of Ron Watkins increased during the first few months as Paul Furber decreased and then dropped completely.
|