Quote:
|
Originally Posted by QuikSand
uncontested physical evidence
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Sidhe
Well the footprints and the hairs are physical evidence, QS. So is the poop, and also tooth impressions, handprints (including the fingerprints, which we call dermal ridges, showing that whatever made the finger or footprint, it wasn't any ordinary human). These are categories of physical evidence.
|
There's the rub. You have physical evidence that
something lost a hair, and that
something took a shit. So far, the simplest explanation for this is a mountain man recluse (human) who hasn't been exposed to many worldly toxins.
I don't mean this as a slam... but this clearly remains the weak spot in the whole argument. If this stuff is demonstrably from a non-human, un-identified creature... then run a lab test or a DNA test of some sort and prove it. If it isn't, or if the labs all say that it looks like human stuff... then it's not really uncontested physical evidence of bigfoot, it's just stuff that may have come from a human or from something else.
One body. One bone. On piece of matter of any sort that can be clerly shown to be non-human and from nothing else we know of. That is, presumably, all it would take.