|
I didn't know % developed was that specifically tied to height/weight. That's neat!
% developed factors into my decision-making to an extent. There's nothing that's too reliable. For me, a low % developed means the player should have a higher bureau grade, but didn't simply because he was generated with low development. If all the other signs check out, that tilts in the player's favor. Not a huge factor, but it's something I consider whenever I ask myself, "Is it plausible that this player is as good as his bars make him look?" Average combine, 4.5 grade, 45% developed -- maybe not. Average combine, 4.5 grade, 15% developed -- maybe there's something there.
|