Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben E Lou
There may be a stray case or two where one of the "also important" combines is actually the "most important" (or they're actually the same)
|
Beginning the process of looking at the correlation coefficients on a larger dataset now. Having looked at QBs, it appears that there won't be any major differences, but that the quoted statement is correct. On a larger, cleaner dataset, it appears that Sole/Bench/Agility are of equal value for QBs. If there is one that is "most important", it's Sole. But they're so close in a sampling of over 12,000 QBs that trying to make the distinction would be a waste of time. I'll check the others and report if anything changes, but I don't see it happening.