Front Office Football Central - View Single Post - FBCB2 discussion: Full version now available

Balldog · 03-26-2010, 05:30 AM

The problem with heights aren't the overall average, its the highs and lows.

In my latest sim....

Siena had a PG that was 6'10"
Old Dominion had a PG that was 5'2"

There were 29 SG 6'8" to 6'10" and a 5'5" and 5'6" SG.

62 SF 6'2" and under.

7 SF at 6'10".

53 PF 6'11 and over (up to 7'3")

12 C 7'2" and over (up to 7'6")

37 C 6'6" and under (lowest at 6'5")

I think the ranges could be tightened.

I'll provide some more specific data this weekend.

03-26-2010, 05:30 AM	#394
Balldog Pro Rookie Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Macomb, MI	The problem with heights aren't the overall average, its the highs and lows. In my latest sim.... Siena had a PG that was 6'10" Old Dominion had a PG that was 5'2" There were 29 SG 6'8" to 6'10" and a 5'5" and 5'6" SG. 62 SF 6'2" and under. 7 SF at 6'10". 53 PF 6'11 and over (up to 7'3") 12 C 7'2" and over (up to 7'6") 37 C 6'6" and under (lowest at 6'5") I think the ranges could be tightened. I'll provide some more specific data this weekend. Last edited by Balldog : 03-26-2010 at 05:51 AM.