Quote:
Originally Posted by Chief Rum
I'm not against switching to a lynch, but I wanted to point this out.
This is the second time in the last two days that a "Lynch supporter" has used more than one day of No Lynches as their baseline for an argument against it, never mind the almost certain likelihood that no one thinks more than one day of No Lynch is a good idea.
Yesterday, Lathum did it, and took it out to four days, and that led me to considering him for a vote for an illogical argument (hyperbole). Alan, you're in the clear, but starting from that baseline argument is just as bad.
If I'm going to switch to a Lynch, it's not going to be because of arguments that include anything about more than one day of "No Lynches". I don't think that will ever be considered. When I hear a convincing argument that even one day of No Lynch hurts us in this case, that is the argument I wil consider.
|
Don't look at me. JAG was the one suggesting 2 days play with lynches equaling a certain score. I was giving the same example with the 4 days if we had no lynches to show why his argument was bad.
Not sure why you are singling me out when I'm just replying back.