|
Saldana, the "look bad" part goes to the argument that Day 1 is random ... until it is not. As information emerges throughout the game, you start taking a look at those random votes and try to discern who was making votes that had a purpose at a point where there should have been no purpose.
Sadly, at this point you have votes on two known villagers. Now the legitimate counter to this is that "wolves can have the best voting records" and it does happen like that sometimes. But fundamentally the wolves do want to get rid of villagers, and they do want to have their votes dispersed from each other as much as possible. So I think it is incumbent upon everyone to try hard to evaluate voting data and place proper (whatever that means) context on it. Right now, in my mind, your voting data looks "bad" but I think there are bigger fish to fry based on where I rated people in my levels of distrust.
|