table_flip.gif
I'll take another (brief) look. I was wondering if that was the case because of the swarm of free agent rookies that were 12/29 overall.
edit: after taking another look the only filler players were undrafted rookies. Maybe 10 total on rosters, the rest are free agents. All rookies. My charts for 40-59 & 60-79 are unaffected, the lower rated counts are.
I did a new output based on all 9s and got the following output. It's really interesting how close the number of 40+ players are since I had to create a new game to get the new output. I expect similar results with the other outputs, the number of players with a current rating of 0-39 will drop by about 1200 total and the 40+ group will be unaffected.
|
|
| range | new value | old value | | 0-9 | 12 | 115 | | 10-19 | 15 | 559 | | 20-29 | 8 | 437 | | 30-39 | 31 | 129 | | 40-49 | 137 | 136 | | 50-59 | 322 | 329 | | 60-69 | 477 | 455 | | 70-79 | 545 | 573 | | 80-89 | 382 | 409 | | 90-99 | 94 | 83 | | 100 | 1 | 0 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|