Quote:
Originally Posted by garion333
If you have crap scouting and interview then I expect one would be focusing on combines and static bars (and masked pairs?). I suppose that makes sense.
Personally, I prefer high scouting because it gives me a better look at the actual player. I'm not generally looking for boomers, but avoiding busts.
|
right, this is conventional wisdom
i'm just plumbing whether there's a contrarian view... not that you
ignore your terrible scout, but you
use his terribleness as an asset... kinda like a Constanza Rule for scouting, you start with what he thinks and do the opposite
if MP and tzach are on board with this, i think it's worth considering