Werewolf XXXVII: Middle-Earth - GAME ENDS. Who Won? Check it out! - Page 16

st.cronin · 11-07-2006, 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blade6119

Post #451 cronin, which people asked you to explain at the time and you never did. Now that you seem to be talking more, care to explain this post from yesterday? Is it in regards to alan, as that was what i felt CR/Saldana debate was over

All I meant was that as I read things I found myself agreeing with saldana's pov. Then some people were saying he was suspicious. Since I know I'm good, I am willing to say that his day 1 play was NOT suspicious.

Lorena · 11-07-2006, 08:49 PM

Well, I'm on pg. 15, but not all the way down. Seems like we need 2 votes to vote for Chief (if I added correctly):

VOTE CHIEF RUM

I absolutely do not like early no-lynches. I voted for him more because we need a majority, not really because I feel he is on the dark side. I feel bad he's not here to defend himself though.

Alan T · 11-07-2006, 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrith

Alan, I am very much not voting for Chief, which would be the error with your record.

Oh you voted for swaggs. ok my bad. I'll fix that. I didnt read clearly. sorry am trying to get the place cleaned up too

Tyrith · 11-07-2006, 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Swaggs

Why did you vote for me, then?

I am one of the few people that have come out and said I am on the side of light and I put out my position that, agree with me or not, I feel like we need to vote/lynch someone because it is one of the only tools available to us, yet you vote for me because I am being suspicious.

Because you kept insisting the day 1 vote record means something. It doesn't. This is pretty much a vote against that idea.

Alan T · 11-07-2006, 08:50 PM

Kk, here is updated list. my apologies:

(11) Chief Rum - Saldana (482), Alan (504), Schmidty (552), Lathum (555), Jonathan Ezarik (577), Thomkal (585), Grammaticus (593), Spleen (625), Lonestargirl (700), Mr. Wednesday (708) Izulde (738)
(7) Lathum - St.Cronin (557), Swaggs (594), Ntndeacon (595), Kwhit (607), Sublime (616), BrianD (707), Daddytorgo (712)
(1) Saldana - Chief Rum (446)
(1) St.cronin - Sndvls (532)
(1) Alan - Blade (611)
(1) Swaggs - Tyrith (704)

Jonathan Ezarik · 11-07-2006, 08:51 PM

That's 12 votes for CR.

Swaggs · 11-07-2006, 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrith

Because you kept insisting the day 1 vote record means something. It doesn't. This is pretty much a vote against that idea.

It will mean something in conjunction with the other votes.

KWhit · 11-07-2006, 08:52 PM

Unvote Lathum

Vote Chief Rum

KWhit · 11-07-2006, 08:53 PM

FYI: My vote change was to try to help make sure we get a majority.

Tyrith · 11-07-2006, 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Swaggs

It will mean something in conjunction with the other votes.

Not really, because they could be fairly certain he was going to die early on and they could use it as a chance to get some "good" votes in. Or, more likely, they didn't know who he was. But this is a situation where there could easily be bad guys that have good records.

st.cronin · 11-07-2006, 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dodgerchick

Well, I'm on pg. 15, but not all the way down. Seems like we need 2 votes to vote for Chief (if I added correctly):

VOTE CHIEF RUM

I absolutely do not like early no-lynches. I voted for him more because we need a majority, not really because I feel he is on the dark side. I feel bad he's not here to defend himself though.

I really don't understand this logic, at all. If you think it's a bad lynch, DON'T VOTE FOR HIM!

Lynching a villager is worse for the village than not lynching anybody.

Alan T · 11-07-2006, 08:55 PM

As of post 759:

(13) Chief Rum - Saldana (482), Alan (504), Schmidty (552), Lathum (555), Jonathan Ezarik (577), Thomkal (585), Grammaticus (593), Spleen (625), Lonestargirl (700), Mr. Wednesday (708) Izulde (738), Dodgerchick (752), Kwhit (758)
(6) Lathum - St.Cronin (557), Swaggs (594), Ntndeacon (595), Sublime (616), BrianD (707), Daddytorgo (712)
(1) Saldana - Chief Rum (446)
(1) St.cronin - Sndvls (532)
(1) Alan - Blade (611)
(1) Swaggs - Tyrith (704)

Blade6119 · 11-07-2006, 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by st.cronin

I really don't understand this logic, at all. If you think it's a bad lynch, DON'T VOTE FOR HIM!

Lynching a villager is worse for the village than not lynching anybody.

I strongly disagree with thos

KWhit · 11-07-2006, 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by st.cronin

I really don't understand this logic, at all. If you think it's a bad lynch, DON'T VOTE FOR HIM!

Lynching a villager is worse for the village than not lynching anybody.

You're right. You just helped me make my decision. I don't really think CR is bad, so I'm switching back.

Sorry if this is a f*** up.

Unvote Chief Rum
Vote Lathum

Alan T · 11-07-2006, 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blade6119

I strongly disagree with thos

How can you strongly disagree with something you are doing?

Lathum · 11-07-2006, 08:59 PM

Tyriths votes are very suspiscous to me. He unvotes me because he says he is sure I am not gonna be lynched, then moves to a Swaggs who has no heat on him at all. It seems to me he is trying to cover his tracks...

KWhit · 11-07-2006, 08:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan T

How can you strongly disagree with something you are doing?

Heh. Good point.

Tyrith · 11-07-2006, 08:59 PM

Lynching a villager is only good for us when finding out his affiliation will really tell us something about the other players. With Chief being gone we pretty much have the first three or four voters with any sort of argument at all, and a bunch of followers. Alan's argument was not liking chief defending someone so easily. Lathum and saldana are just saying that they've seen him play like this before and be bad. These arguments wouldn't tell me much about them if he was lynched, because they had to make some weak argument today to put a vote in. In this case I think if we lynch a villager we're mostly just down a villager -- the information won't be worth a dead body.

Of course, there's the chance he's bad you also have to weigh in, meaning I can't completely object to this.

Sublime 2 · 11-07-2006, 09:00 PM

I feel that there is atleast a small case to vote Lathum at this point, st. cronin pointed this out around post 705 or so, but I'm missing why we should be voting CR.

Alan T · 11-07-2006, 09:00 PM

Well its deadline.. guess good or bad, we find out something maybe.

(12) Chief Rum - Saldana (482), Alan (504), Schmidty (552), Lathum (555), Jonathan Ezarik (577), Thomkal (585), Grammaticus (593), Spleen (625), Lonestargirl (700), Mr. Wednesday (708) Izulde (738), Dodgerchick (752)
(7) Lathum - St.Cronin (557), Swaggs (594), Ntndeacon (595), Sublime (616), BrianD (707), Daddytorgo (712), Kwhit (765)
(1) Saldana - Chief Rum (446)
(1) St.cronin - Sndvls (532)
(1) Alan - Blade (611)
(1) Swaggs - Tyrith (704)

Abe Sargent · 11-07-2006, 09:00 PM

That is time. For today's vote, we need 12 out of 23 players. Let me go check.

saldana · 11-07-2006, 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by st.cronin

I really don't understand this logic, at all. If you think it's a bad lynch, DON'T VOTE FOR HIM!

Lynching a villager is worse for the village than not lynching anybody.

Quote:

Originally Posted by KWhit

You're right. You just helped me make my decision. I don't really think CR is bad, so I'm switching back.

Sorry if this is a f*** up.

Unvote Chief Rum
Vote Lathum

because we have a chance of hitting a bad guy instead of sitting on our hands and letting the forces of darkness pick us off one at a time at night. look how lucky we got yesterday...nothing to say we couldnt get that lucky again.

Sublime 2 · 11-07-2006, 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrith

Lynching a villager is only good for us when finding out his affiliation will really tell us something about the other players. With Chief being gone we pretty much have the first three or four voters with any sort of argument at all, and a bunch of followers. Alan's argument was not liking chief defending someone so easily. Lathum and saldana are just saying that they've seen him play like this before and be bad. These arguments wouldn't tell me much about them if he was lynched, because they had to make some weak argument today to put a vote in. In this case I think if we lynch a villager we're mostly just down a villager -- the information won't be worth a dead body.

Of course, there's the chance he's bad you also have to weigh in, meaning I can't completely object to this.

Ok, I think i missed these points before, atleast Lathum and saldana's.

Blade6119 · 11-07-2006, 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan T

How can you strongly disagree with something you are doing?

Im voting you for the sole reason of getting you and cronin to shut up. My original action was to vote chief and be make sure the lynch happened. You both threw a big fit over it becuase i feel he is good, so to stop you two from whining incessantly i swapped to you. I am voting you becuase your my top suspect and you nagged me enough about how my original choice was such a terrible decision.

Tyrith · 11-07-2006, 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lathum

Tyriths votes are very suspiscous to me. He unvotes me because he says he is sure I am not gonna be lynched, then moves to a Swaggs who has no heat on him at all. It seems to me he is trying to cover his tracks...

Then you better be damn well suspicious of Blade, too. I won't let you get away with just pointing it at me.

Alan T · 11-07-2006, 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blade6119

Im voting you for the sole reason of getting you and cronin to shut up. My original action was to vote chief and be make sure the lynch happened. You both threw a big fit over it becuase i feel he is good, so to stop you two from whining incessantly i swapped to you. I am voting you becuase your my top suspect and you nagged me enough about how my original choice was such a terrible decision.

Stop putting words in my mouth. The only fit I had was you saying that I made you vote a certain way. I don't care honestly how you vote.

Lathum · 11-07-2006, 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrith

Then you better be damn well suspicious of Blade, too. I won't let you get away with just pointing it at me.

blades actions early in the game lead me to believe he is of no harm to us.

Jonathan Ezarik · 11-07-2006, 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by st.cronin

Lynching a villager is worse for the village than not lynching anybody.

Should we never vote to lynch anyone again unless we are absolutely sure that he's not a villager? Instead we should just wait until we get picked off one by one?

Abe Sargent · 11-07-2006, 09:05 PM

I have 12 for Chief Rum. Is that confirmed?

Blade6119 · 11-07-2006, 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrith

Then you better be damn well suspicious of Blade, too. I won't let you get away with just pointing it at me.

Ive got my own problems to deal with tyrith...when you get on my level of heat, EVERY GAME, then come talk to me. The amount of heat you have on you is like childs play compared to what ive had to put up with so far.

Tyrith · 11-07-2006, 09:05 PM

Furthermore, I was right about you not going to be getting lynched; even with everyone that had voted for you it would have been, what, 10 votes? With the remaining outstanding votes being highly unlikely to move towards you instead of the candidate with the higher count.

Tyrith · 11-07-2006, 09:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blade6119

Ive got my own problems to deal with tyrith...when you get on my level of heat, EVERY GAME, then come talk to me. The amount of heat you have on you is like childs play compared to what ive had to put up with so far.

I wasn't trying to point him at you as to point out that his logic had holes in it. I've told you repeatedly today that I'm on your side in this war against people killing you for bad reasons, remember?

Jonathan Ezarik · 11-07-2006, 09:06 PM

That's what I've got too, Abe.

SnDvls · 11-07-2006, 09:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anxiety

I have 12 for Chief Rum. Is that confirmed?

I think that's what alan has too

Tyrith · 11-07-2006, 09:07 PM

I also have 12 for chief.

Abe Sargent · 11-07-2006, 09:08 PM

The evening brings an end to the sunshine that penetrated the fog and another day of deliberations. Fresh from success the previous day and a reminder of why you are embarking on this task last night, resolve hardens your veins and tendons.

Tonight you vote another of your own for lynching. Righteousness boils through the assembly. You have voted for Chief Rum. When the final vote is tallied, he cries out in fright and scurries underneath the tale, but you pull his three foot two inch frame out from under the table easily enough.

One of you carries him to the central gallows you had set up but with which you do not administer justice the previous evening, since Scoobz forced you to cut him down. This will be the first lynch of the freshly cut and assembled gallows.

Right away you notice a problem. Your gallows are man height, and not designed for a hobbit. You discuss the situation and decide to have someone hold him up while the rope is tied around his neck, then release him.

You begin to prepare the rope, and Chief Rum looks at you with wide eyed horror. He knows that death has marked him, and fate will off him this evening. His tears of sorrow glisten in the twilight, but your resolve is set. Although a few of you begin to have doubts, the assembly has spoken.

The sight of the hobbit, openly weeping in torment, is ultimately too much for you, and you have to cover his head. You cast lots to see who will have to hold him up, and once that is decided, the task begins. His hobbit frame squirms under the weight of the hanging, and it takes him a lot longer to die than a human would have taken, because he weighs less. After a half hour of horror, he still twitches occasionally. You decide to leave him alone for now and investigate his place.

Nob was a hobbit servant at the Prancing Pony Inn, and he kept a small room there, underneath the Inn. You enter it as best as you can, but find nothing to verify your suspicions. As far as you can tell, he was just a normal hobbit who served you all just as he did Mr. Underhill’s party.

Realizing your mistake, you hurry back to the gallows, but it is too late, and the hobbit lies dead. The sheer terror on his face as he realized that his friends and associates were about to kill him are everywhere you turn, and shutting your eyes does not blank the shame.

Day Two has ended. Night Two has begun. It ends at 3:30 am EST Wednesday morning.

-Anxiety

Lorena · 11-07-2006, 09:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by st.cronin

I really don't understand this logic, at all. If you think it's a bad lynch, DON'T VOTE FOR HIM!

Lynching a villager is worse for the village than not lynching anybody.

See, what's different about this game is that we need a majority (50% +1), so that means we either kill someone and learn something based on voting records or trails people leave, or we keep our finger up our butt and let the dark side kill us off one by one, or multiple times a night.

Who knows, Chief just MIGHT be evil, we'll have to see, but I just don't want an early no-lynch.

st.cronin · 11-07-2006, 09:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jonathan Ezarik

Should we never vote to lynch anyone again unless we are absolutely sure that he's not a villager? Instead we should just wait until we get picked off one by one?

No, of course not. But voting INSERT RANDOM PLAYER simply because you think you HAVE to lynch somebody is really pathetic. Show some stones, find a reason to vote for somebody.

Sublime 2 · 11-07-2006, 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Blade6119

Ive got my own problems to deal with tyrith...when you get on my level of heat, EVERY GAME, then come talk to me. The amount of heat you have on you is like childs play compared to what ive had to put up with so far.

I'm not saying I didn't enjoy the bit yesterday, but don't you think you kind of brought some of the heat on you in the beginning of this? Like i said i didn't mind like some did, but it certainly raises an eyebrow or two.

Lathum · 11-07-2006, 09:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tyrith

Furthermore, I was right about you not going to be getting lynched; even with everyone that had voted for you it would have been, what, 10 votes? With the remaining outstanding votes being highly unlikely to move towards you instead of the candidate with the higher count.

so if you were so sure I wasn't gonna be lynched why switch?

st.cronin · 11-07-2006, 09:10 PM

ah well

I am right again.

DaddyTorgo · 11-07-2006, 09:10 PM

dammit!!!

Abe Sargent · 11-07-2006, 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo

dammit!!!

Watch the language.

Swaggs · 11-07-2006, 09:11 PM

Wow... that was a powerful write up.

Izulde · 11-07-2006, 09:12 PM

Ugh. That sucks.

Beautiful writeup though, Anxiety.

Tyrith · 11-07-2006, 09:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lathum

so if you were so sure I wasn't gonna be lynched why switch?

Because I could use the vote to rally against a point of contention in the game. Although, to be fair, I should have explained the vote better at the time, but I was not happy.

DaddyTorgo · 11-07-2006, 09:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anxiety

Watch the language.

errr sorry

"Dagnabbit!" or "darnit!"

do you want me to edit it?

Blade6119 · 11-07-2006, 09:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan T

Stop putting words in my mouth. The only fit I had was you saying that I made you vote a certain way. I don't care honestly how you vote.

My arguement was you were my top suspect. I said becuase you werent going to get lynched, id take your supporter as my second best suspect. I never said you compelled me to vote a certain way, so stop putting words into my mouth...

By the way, i love these two posts

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan T

Dola,

I love the arguement I'm going to vote with person X, but if my vote ends up being bad I'm going to vote for person X tommorrow.

Please Blade, don't do me any favors and vote for someone else if you don't agree with my reasoning. I give my reasons for the vote, agree with them or disagree with them but in no way am I compelling you to do something you don't want to do.

You actually recognize my acutal argument in the first half, then digress...I love how that one ends and this one follows shortly...nice contrast

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan T

If you think Chief is good, then don't vote him. Sheesh

SnDvls · 11-07-2006, 09:13 PM

sucks big time

wish CR could have been here to defend himself

Jonathan Ezarik · 11-07-2006, 09:14 PM

I thought we needed 13 for the 50%+1?

11-07-2006, 09:00 PM	#771
Abe Sargent Hall Of Famer Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Catonsville, MD	That is time. For today's vote, we need 12 out of 23 players. Let me go check. __________________ Check out my two current weekly Magic columns! https://www.coolstuffinc.com/a/?action=search&page=1&author[]=Abe%20Sargent

11-07-2006, 09:05 PM	#779
Abe Sargent Hall Of Famer Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Catonsville, MD	I have 12 for Chief Rum. Is that confirmed? __________________ Check out my two current weekly Magic columns! https://www.coolstuffinc.com/a/?action=search&page=1&author[]=Abe%20Sargent

11-07-2006, 09:08 PM	#786
Abe Sargent Hall Of Famer Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Catonsville, MD	The evening brings an end to the sunshine that penetrated the fog and another day of deliberations. Fresh from success the previous day and a reminder of why you are embarking on this task last night, resolve hardens your veins and tendons. Tonight you vote another of your own for lynching. Righteousness boils through the assembly. You have voted for Chief Rum. When the final vote is tallied, he cries out in fright and scurries underneath the tale, but you pull his three foot two inch frame out from under the table easily enough. One of you carries him to the central gallows you had set up but with which you do not administer justice the previous evening, since Scoobz forced you to cut him down. This will be the first lynch of the freshly cut and assembled gallows. Right away you notice a problem. Your gallows are man height, and not designed for a hobbit. You discuss the situation and decide to have someone hold him up while the rope is tied around his neck, then release him. You begin to prepare the rope, and Chief Rum looks at you with wide eyed horror. He knows that death has marked him, and fate will off him this evening. His tears of sorrow glisten in the twilight, but your resolve is set. Although a few of you begin to have doubts, the assembly has spoken. The sight of the hobbit, openly weeping in torment, is ultimately too much for you, and you have to cover his head. You cast lots to see who will have to hold him up, and once that is decided, the task begins. His hobbit frame squirms under the weight of the hanging, and it takes him a lot longer to die than a human would have taken, because he weighs less. After a half hour of horror, he still twitches occasionally. You decide to leave him alone for now and investigate his place. Nob was a hobbit servant at the Prancing Pony Inn, and he kept a small room there, underneath the Inn. You enter it as best as you can, but find nothing to verify your suspicions. As far as you can tell, he was just a normal hobbit who served you all just as he did Mr. Underhill’s party. Realizing your mistake, you hurry back to the gallows, but it is too late, and the hobbit lies dead. The sheer terror on his face as he realized that his friends and associates were about to kill him are everywhere you turn, and shutting your eyes does not blank the shame. Day Two has ended. Night Two has begun. It ends at 3:30 am EST Wednesday morning. -Anxiety __________________ Check out my two current weekly Magic columns! https://www.coolstuffinc.com/a/?action=search&page=1&author[]=Abe%20Sargent

11-07-2006, 09:10 PM	#791
st.cronin General Manager Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: New Mexico	ah well I am right again. __________________ co-commish: bb-bbcf.net knives out

11-07-2006, 09:11 PM	#794
Swaggs Coordinator Join Date: Oct 2000	Wow... that was a powerful write up. __________________ DOWN WITH HATTRICK!!! The RWBL Are you reading In The Bleachers?

11-07-2006, 08:49 PM	#752
Lorena Unregistered Join Date: May 2004	Well, I'm on pg. 15, but not all the way down. Seems like we need 2 votes to vote for Chief (if I added correctly): VOTE CHIEF RUM I absolutely do not like early no-lynches. I voted for him more because we need a majority, not really because I feel he is on the dark side. I feel bad he's not here to defend himself though.

11-07-2006, 08:50 PM	#755
Alan T Hall Of Famer Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Mass.	Kk, here is updated list. my apologies: (11) Chief Rum - Saldana (482), Alan (504), Schmidty (552), Lathum (555), Jonathan Ezarik (577), Thomkal (585), Grammaticus (593), Spleen (625), Lonestargirl (700), Mr. Wednesday (708) Izulde (738) (7) Lathum - St.Cronin (557), Swaggs (594), Ntndeacon (595), Kwhit (607), Sublime (616), BrianD (707), Daddytorgo (712) (1) Saldana - Chief Rum (446) (1) St.cronin - Sndvls (532) (1) Alan - Blade (611) (1) Swaggs - Tyrith (704)

11-07-2006, 08:51 PM	#756
Jonathan Ezarik College Benchwarmer Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Bossier City, LA	That's 12 votes for CR.

11-07-2006, 08:52 PM	#758
KWhit Coordinator Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Conyers GA	Unvote Lathum Vote Chief Rum

11-07-2006, 08:53 PM	#759
KWhit Coordinator Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Conyers GA	FYI: My vote change was to try to help make sure we get a majority.

11-07-2006, 08:55 PM	#762
Alan T Hall Of Famer Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Mass.	As of post 759: (13) Chief Rum - Saldana (482), Alan (504), Schmidty (552), Lathum (555), Jonathan Ezarik (577), Thomkal (585), Grammaticus (593), Spleen (625), Lonestargirl (700), Mr. Wednesday (708) Izulde (738), Dodgerchick (752), Kwhit (758) (6) Lathum - St.Cronin (557), Swaggs (594), Ntndeacon (595), Sublime (616), BrianD (707), Daddytorgo (712) (1) Saldana - Chief Rum (446) (1) St.cronin - Sndvls (532) (1) Alan - Blade (611) (1) Swaggs - Tyrith (704)

11-07-2006, 08:59 PM	#766
Lathum Favored Bitch #1 Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: homeless in NJ	Tyriths votes are very suspiscous to me. He unvotes me because he says he is sure I am not gonna be lynched, then moves to a Swaggs who has no heat on him at all. It seems to me he is trying to cover his tracks...

11-07-2006, 08:59 PM	#768
Tyrith College Starter Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Houston, TX	Lynching a villager is only good for us when finding out his affiliation will really tell us something about the other players. With Chief being gone we pretty much have the first three or four voters with any sort of argument at all, and a bunch of followers. Alan's argument was not liking chief defending someone so easily. Lathum and saldana are just saying that they've seen him play like this before and be bad. These arguments wouldn't tell me much about them if he was lynched, because they had to make some weak argument today to put a vote in. In this case I think if we lynch a villager we're mostly just down a villager -- the information won't be worth a dead body. Of course, there's the chance he's bad you also have to weigh in, meaning I can't completely object to this.

11-07-2006, 09:00 PM	#769
Sublime 2 College Benchwarmer Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: New Hampshire	I feel that there is atleast a small case to vote Lathum at this point, st. cronin pointed this out around post 705 or so, but I'm missing why we should be voting CR.

11-07-2006, 09:00 PM	#770
Alan T Hall Of Famer Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Mass.	Well its deadline.. guess good or bad, we find out something maybe. (12) Chief Rum - Saldana (482), Alan (504), Schmidty (552), Lathum (555), Jonathan Ezarik (577), Thomkal (585), Grammaticus (593), Spleen (625), Lonestargirl (700), Mr. Wednesday (708) Izulde (738), Dodgerchick (752) (7) Lathum - St.Cronin (557), Swaggs (594), Ntndeacon (595), Sublime (616), BrianD (707), Daddytorgo (712), Kwhit (765) (1) Saldana - Chief Rum (446) (1) St.cronin - Sndvls (532) (1) Alan - Blade (611) (1) Swaggs - Tyrith (704)

11-07-2006, 09:05 PM	#781
Tyrith College Starter Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Houston, TX	Furthermore, I was right about you not going to be getting lynched; even with everyone that had voted for you it would have been, what, 10 votes? With the remaining outstanding votes being highly unlikely to move towards you instead of the candidate with the higher count.

11-07-2006, 09:06 PM	#783
Jonathan Ezarik College Benchwarmer Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Bossier City, LA	That's what I've got too, Abe.

11-07-2006, 09:07 PM	#785
Tyrith College Starter Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Houston, TX	I also have 12 for chief.

11-07-2006, 09:10 PM	#792
DaddyTorgo Hall Of Famer Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Massachusetts	dammit!!!

11-07-2006, 09:12 PM	#795
Izulde Head Coach Join Date: Sep 2004	Ugh. That sucks. Beautiful writeup though, Anxiety. __________________ 2006 Golden Scribe Nominee 2006 Golden Scribe Winner Best Non-Sport Dynasty: May Our Reign Be Green and Golden (CK Dynasty) Rookie Writer of the Year Dynasty of the Year: May Our Reign Be Green and Golden (CK Dynasty)

11-07-2006, 09:13 PM	#799
SnDvls Pro Starter Join Date: Jul 2001	sucks big time wish CR could have been here to defend himself

11-07-2006, 09:14 PM	#800
Jonathan Ezarik College Benchwarmer Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Bossier City, LA	I thought we needed 13 for the 50%+1?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests)