Front Office Football Central  

Go Back   Front Office Football Central > Main Forums > FOF9, FOF8, and TCY Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Statistics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-25-2008, 12:26 PM   #1
danimal
n00b
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
PD% and PR%

This may be a stupid question, but how does the game calculate pass defense % and pass rush %? I understand what these stats mean, but I'm curious about how they are calculated.

danimal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008, 12:30 PM   #2
Ben E Lou
Morgado's Favorite Forum Fascist
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Greensboro, NC
Morgado ran a regression and came up with a very close approximation to the PD% calculation, and I know I figured out PRPct at one point. Gimme a bit to dig those up. Or cuervo might bve able to help you here, too.
__________________
The media don't understand the kinds of problems and pressures 54 million come wit'!
Ben E Lou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008, 12:49 PM   #3
QuikSand
lolzcat
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
I am pretty sure that once it got patched, PR% is simply the % of pass plays in which the QB was sacked, the QB was hurried, or the pass was blocked.

PD is tougher, but it's been cracked, as SkyDog mentioned. It clearly is centered on 82.5, moves up with passes defensed and interceptions, and down with catches allowed (all normalized to number of pass plays, I believe) but I think in an effort to make this formula more mysterious they are no longer linear calculations and are instead logarithmic or somesuch.
QuikSand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008, 12:55 PM   #4
danimal
n00b
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by QuikSand View Post
I am pretty sure that once it got patched, PR% is simply the % of pass plays in which the QB was sacked, the QB was hurried, or the pass was blocked.

Awesome, thanks. I suspected as much, but it's good to get the confirmation.

Quote:
PD is tougher, but it's been cracked, as SkyDog mentioned. It clearly is centered on 82.5, moves up with passes defensed and interceptions, and down with catches allowed (all normalized to number of pass plays, I believe) but I think in an effort to make this formula more mysterious they are no longer linear calculations and are instead logarithmic or somesuch.

I see. That's why I had so much difficulty figuring this one out. So a defensive back with PD% above 82.5 would be considered above average, and a defensive back with PD% below 82.5 would be considered below average. Is that the best way to read this?
danimal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008, 01:45 PM   #5
cuervo72
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Maryland
82.5 + (505 * sum(ints) + 240 * sum(passdefended) - 135 * sum(passcaught))/sum(passplays)


At least, that's what Morg came up with.
__________________
null

Last edited by cuervo72 : 01-25-2008 at 01:45 PM.
cuervo72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008, 01:50 PM   #6
Ben E Lou
Morgado's Favorite Forum Fascist
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Greensboro, NC
Quote:
Originally Posted by QuikSand View Post
I am pretty sure that once it got patched, PR% is simply the % of pass plays in which the QB was sacked, the QB was hurried, or the pass was blocked.
Heh. Now that you mention it, that is correct. Hadn't thought about it in a while.

Quote:
but I think in an effort to make this formula more mysterious they are no longer linear calculations and are instead logarithmic or somesuch.
...or it could be FOF's rather quirky rounding of these sorts of ratings. That was the case with the old 20-based PDPct formula in FOF2K4, if I recall correctly. Morg's formula gets it close enough for the purpose of MP leagues displaying it, though.
__________________
The media don't understand the kinds of problems and pressures 54 million come wit'!
Ben E Lou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008, 01:53 PM   #7
QuikSand
lolzcat
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
Quote:
Originally Posted by danimal View Post
I see. That's why I had so much difficulty figuring this one out. So a defensive back with PD% above 82.5 would be considered above average, and a defensive back with PD% below 82.5 would be considered below average. Is that the best way to read this?

Conceptually, yes, but I think the weightings used (see above) tend to penalize more than they reward. If you have a full-time defensive back with a PD% that's above the 82.5 mark here, he very likely either (a) had a lot of interceptions, or (b) had a really, really good season. I would guess that a truly average CB in full-time play probably posts around a 74-78 or so here.
QuikSand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008, 01:54 PM   #8
danimal
n00b
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by cuervo72 View Post
82.5 + (505 * sum(ints) + 240 * sum(passdefended) - 135 * sum(passcaught))/sum(passplays)


At least, that's what Morg came up with.

What an arcane formula...

Thanks again, guys.
danimal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008, 02:02 PM   #9
Ben E Lou
Morgado's Favorite Forum Fascist
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Greensboro, NC
Quote:
Originally Posted by QuikSand View Post
I would guess that a truly average CB in full-time play probably posts around a 74-78 or so here.
Gimme about 3 minutes, and I can answer this one...
__________________
The media don't understand the kinds of problems and pressures 54 million come wit'!
Ben E Lou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008, 02:12 PM   #10
Ben E Lou
Morgado's Favorite Forum Fascist
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Greensboro, NC
Average for all CBs = 78.68

Edit to Add...

FS: 79.46
SS: 80.34
__________________
The media don't understand the kinds of problems and pressures 54 million come wit'!

Last edited by Ben E Lou : 01-28-2008 at 02:08 PM.
Ben E Lou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008, 02:13 PM   #11
Ben E Lou
Morgado's Favorite Forum Fascist
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Greensboro, NC
(That's over a 26-year SP career. Extender is da BIZOMB!!!)
__________________
The media don't understand the kinds of problems and pressures 54 million come wit'!
Ben E Lou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2008, 04:29 PM   #12
QuikSand
lolzcat
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Annapolis, Md
Thanks.
QuikSand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2008, 02:09 PM   #13
Ben E Lou
Morgado's Favorite Forum Fascist
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Greensboro, NC
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkyDog View Post
Average for all CBs = 78.68

Edit to Add...

FS: 79.46
SS: 80.34
Bump to reflect additional calculations, for anyone interested in what an average player is.
__________________
The media don't understand the kinds of problems and pressures 54 million come wit'!
Ben E Lou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2008, 08:00 AM   #14
Narcizo
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkyDog View Post
Average for all CBs = 78.68

Edit to Add...

FS: 79.46
SS: 80.34

Interesting. I've always been a bit harsh on my cornerbacks then as I've always thought around 80 was the mark they should be aiming for. Looks like I'm alright with my safeties though.

Cheers SkyDog.
Narcizo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2008, 08:03 AM   #15
Ben E Lou
Morgado's Favorite Forum Fascist
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Greensboro, NC
Quote:
Originally Posted by Narcizo View Post
Interesting. I've always been a bit harsh on my cornerbacks then as I've always thought around 80 was the mark they should be aiming for. Looks like I'm alright with my safeties though.
Same here.

Incidentally, when I looked at just the "full-time" corners, the number was pretty much identical. I presume that's because the better corners are assigned coverage responsibilities on the better receivers.
__________________
The media don't understand the kinds of problems and pressures 54 million come wit'!
Ben E Lou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2008, 08:09 AM   #16
danimal
n00b
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkyDog View Post
Average for all CBs = 78.68

Edit to Add...

FS: 79.46
SS: 80.34

Thanks again, SkyDog. This is great color.
danimal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-2008, 08:50 AM   #17
Narcizo
Pro Rookie
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Out of interest what are the numbers for linebackers. I'm guessing the average is around 73 or so.
Narcizo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2008, 03:15 PM   #18
Firefly
High School Varsity
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Very interesting thread. I was just wondering the same thing.

I'd love to know the number for LBs too, if someone has it.
Firefly is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:16 AM.



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.