Front Office Football Central  

Go Back   Front Office Football Central > Main Forums > Off Topic
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Statistics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-12-2026, 08:01 PM   #51
JPhillips
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
No, you trade shares based on which team you think will win.

Totally different, you see?
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers

JPhillips is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2026, 08:03 PM   #52
RainMaker
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Oh yeah. They also don't offer parlays but "combos" which are eerily similar.
RainMaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2026, 08:35 PM   #53
Lathum
Favored Bitch #1
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
Quote:
Originally Posted by RainMaker View Post
I guess I'm still confused how Kalshi and Polymarket aren't considered gambling. You literally bet on which team wins a game.

Because the presidents son is on the boards of both.
Lathum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-12-2026, 08:36 PM   #54
Lathum
Favored Bitch #1
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
Quote:
Originally Posted by flere-imsaho View Post
I think the crux of the problem here is that there appears to be absolutely no regulatory check on outright predatory practices. In an ideal world there'd be a regulator with knowledge of the gambling industry who could take a look at offerings and say "uh, no, you aren't going to do that".

I read a lot of stuff about it and the thing it is most often compared to is the practices of big tobacco marketing to kids back in the day
Lathum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2026, 10:25 PM   #55
JPhillips
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
WSJ looked into Polymarket and found 67% of the profits are going to .1% of account holders.

If you aren't scamming, you're being scammed.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers

Last edited by JPhillips : 05-05-2026 at 08:28 AM.
JPhillips is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2026, 08:16 AM   #56
albionmoonlight
Head Coach
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: North Carolina
I was as wrong about the social costs of the increased availability of wagering as I've been about almost anything in my life.
albionmoonlight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2026, 08:21 AM   #57
flere-imsaho
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Chicagoland
Quote:
Originally Posted by JPhillips View Post
WSJ looked into Polymarket and found 67% of the profits are going to .1% of account holders.

I wonder how this compares to the regular economy.
flere-imsaho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2026, 08:43 AM   #58
Lathum
Favored Bitch #1
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
Quote:
Originally Posted by albionmoonlight View Post
I was as wrong about the social costs of the increased availability of wagering as I've been about almost anything in my life.

We’re just seeing the tip of the iceberg. Virtually every college aged male bets on sports. The long term impacts are going to be catastrophic.
Lathum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-01-2026, 11:52 AM   #59
Lathum
Favored Bitch #1
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: homeless in NJ
Putting this here because it is one of the ugly side effects of legalized sports betting. I hope they find this person and bury them under the prison.

Lathum is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:51 AM.



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.