03-19-2004, 02:14 AM | #1 | ||
Pro Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
|
Taiwanese president shot!!!!
Here in Korea we just got this report in!Holy F' Shit.Stand by for more info once I get it.
link: Taiwan prez shot Last edited by Galaril : 03-19-2004 at 02:16 AM. |
||
03-19-2004, 02:15 AM | #2 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NJ
|
I'm not very cultured, but is this a huge world wide story?
Last edited by Suicane75 : 03-19-2004 at 02:16 AM. |
03-19-2004, 02:18 AM | #3 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Green Bay, WI
|
It has some fairly large ramifications.
The Taiwanese president, if I'm not mistaken, has been one of the most outspoken supporters of Taiwanese independence and democracy, neither of which make Beijing very happy at all. China has threatened war if Taiwan tries to separate itself further from the mainland than it has already, and if the United States gets involved in Taiwan's defense, things could get downright ugly in a hurry. So, insofar as this could seriously impact, one way or another, Taiwanese/Chinese diplomatic relations, then yeah, it's a huge worldwide story. No telling where this is gonna go, depending on who's responsible for the shooting. |
03-19-2004, 02:18 AM | #4 |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
|
It is if china (likely)did it.Imagine if they could be implicated.It could precipitate nuclear war.(unlikely)
|
03-19-2004, 02:18 AM | #5 |
College Benchwarmer
Join Date: Jun 2003
|
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/3548893.stm
Taiwan's President Chen wounded Taiwan's President Chen Shui-bian has been wounded during campaigning in Tainan in southern Taiwan. Initial reports said the president may have been injured by a firecracker but a legislator from Mr Chen's party was quoted as saying he had been shot. Mr Chen was taken to hospital with a stomach wound while Vice-President Annette Lu was said to have hurt her leg. Neither injury is thought serious. Taiwan is holding its presidential election on Saturday. |
03-19-2004, 02:20 AM | #6 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Green Bay, WI
|
Dola,
Does anybody else think it's absolutely ridiculous just how many missiles China has pointed at Taiwan (to say nothing of their repeated efforts to influence Taiwanese elections)? I mean, this would be like if, say, Guam was thinking it didn't want to be a US protectorate anymore, and we decided it was necessary to point several hundred ICBMs at them to 'persuade' them against that course of action. It's like using a sledgehammer to swat a fly. |
03-19-2004, 02:22 AM | #7 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Green Bay, WI
|
Quote:
Depends on how far the conflict spreads. If the US stays out of it, then it'd probably be a localized conflict, and China would overrun Taiwan pretty quickly. If the US gets involved, then whether or not it goes nuclear depends upon a whole host of factors - primarily whether or not China would enjoy any sort of international support for their position. If any sort of embargo was slapped on them, I wouldn't be at all surprised to see them resort to the nuclear option to win the conflict. When you have a billion mouths to feed, you tend to react just a little more strongly to perceived threats to your survival. |
|
03-19-2004, 04:06 AM | #8 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Concord, MA/UMass
|
Maybe the French will back China since they've already been conducting joint naval exercises off Taiwan's coast the last few days.
If China does seriously threaten Taiwan, the US will probably announce their full support for Taiwan. If China invades, who knows what we'll do. I don't know much about the election, but it seems this will almost certainly ensure a Chen victory. Last edited by BishopMVP : 03-19-2004 at 04:07 AM. |
03-19-2004, 04:07 AM | #9 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the yo'
|
Isnt protection of Taiwan one of the tenants of our foreign policy?
As in an act of aggression against Taiwan, is essentially the same as an act of agression against the US. This could suck bad(not likely). |
03-19-2004, 04:08 AM | #10 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Concord, MA/UMass
|
We've always unofficially supported Taiwan, but I think Bush or someone in his administration annouced our full support for Taiwanese soveriegnty or something...too lazy to look up details but China and some Americans were pissed off about that.
|
03-19-2004, 04:21 AM | #11 | |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Green Bay, WI
|
Quote:
Well, yes and no. Our official policy for years has been a support of democracy wherever it may spring up. There's some Sino/American friction over Hong Kong for that same reason, actually. Thing is...for the longest time, there was a 'one China' policy. Y'see, China's "official" name is the People's Republic of China (which is the single biggest misnomer I've ever seen). Taiwan styles itself the "Republic of China," but we simply referred to them as Taiwan. It wasn't, I think, until the Bush Administration that there was any sort of change in that policy. It didn't make the Chinese too happy, and there were quite a few Americans who felt like that was an unnecessary provocation of a country that, in addition to being one of our largest trading partners, is also the home of one of the world's largest standing militaries (I think North Korea actually holds the dubious honor of having THE largest standing army). The thing is...I'm not sure Taiwan enjoys the same level of support that, say, Israel does. If Israel were attacked, I'm fairly sure the US would back the Israelis in a heartbeat. Taiwan? I'm not so sure our leadership would be eager (or willing) to pick a fight in a region that essentially has four nuclear powers - one of which was for much of the 20th century an enemy (and remains an uneasy ally), and another that really doesn't think much of us. The other troubling thing is just the general instability of the entire region. Let's say China does assault Taiwan. Do we move to their defense? If not, then does that embolden India to move on Kashmir, or North Korea to go after South Korea? The rationalist in me wants to say that India wouldn't do anything rash, but I'm not as certain of Pakistan, and both of those nations have nukes (and probably wouldn't hesitate to use them on each other if the perceived need arose). It's just a house of cards waiting to fall, and I think that's part of the reason the Bush administration hasn't been as eager to topple Kim Il Jong as they were to remove Saddam. yeah, Iraq is unstable right now, but nothing like the mess you'd see in eastern Asia if the shit hit the fan. Just my late night ramblings. |
|
03-19-2004, 08:09 AM | #12 |
Coordinator
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Jacksonville, FL
|
Id love to see where you got the notes on the French/doing joint NAval exercises with the Chinese. Please I beg you to put them on here and change the initial expression on my face of WTF, another lil POC to support the current Admin's stance on the foreign policy side of things.
Abd I stand corrected and am not happy about this from the French. In such sensitive times to have joint military ops. with a country that is threatening to induce civil war I find deplorable. Now I hope the current Admin will let the French know of their dismay.
__________________
Jacksonville-florida-homes-for-sale Putting a New Spin on Real Estate! ----------------------------------------------------------- Commissioner of the USFL USFL Last edited by Flasch186 : 03-19-2004 at 06:06 PM. |
03-19-2004, 08:18 AM | #13 | |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: USA
|
Quote:
Embargo? Walmart would have to close its doors. We would run out of flags pretty quickly. Some IT companies that offshored their work to Chinese companies would go in the tank. An embargo against China would have some effects on our economy. |
|
03-19-2004, 08:18 AM | #14 |
College Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Beantown
|
Anyone else suspect Al Qaeda?
__________________
Boston Bashers - III.14 - (8347) |
03-19-2004, 08:21 AM | #15 | |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: USA
|
Quote:
I suspect that the difference here has everything to do with money. There is more money and power in prominent places in America that would demand support for Israel. No such structure exists in support of Taiwan. Those are just my 'off-the-cuff' thoughts and remarks. I haven't looked up anything. Last edited by Tekneek : 03-19-2004 at 08:22 AM. |
|
03-19-2004, 08:23 AM | #16 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Here
|
The US won't do anything unless there is a full scale invasion of Taiwan by China. If Taiwan makes the first move we definitely do nothing.
|
03-19-2004, 08:53 AM | #17 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: St. Paul, MN
|
I read somewhere that China doesn't have the ability to invade Taiwan.
|
03-19-2004, 09:00 AM | #18 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
|
First, the One-China policy has not changed. Bush went off the reservation when Chen was in the US and seemed to change the One-China stance, but Powell quickly covered for the President and stated that there was in fact no change of policy. If I remember right Fliescher made a similar correction during the press briefeing the next day.
As to what we would do if China invaded, good question. Either option would cripple the world economy. Something like 90% of the world's microchips are made in Taiwan, while any number of products are made in China. The darkest side of outsourcing is that it has real impact on our foriegn policy. The reason we have to walk the knife edge on China/Taiwan is less about nuclear war and more about economics at this point. And those of you who are sure of Bush taking a tough stance on China, think again. Over the past year or so we have let China get away with a number of things so that they will help us deal with N. Korea. Because we really have no military option for N. Korea, at least as long as we have 100,000+ troops in Iraq and probably until we are ready to greatly expand the army, we need China to ensure N. Korea doesn't go nuts. |
03-19-2004, 09:06 AM | #19 | |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
|
Quote:
It wasn't my comment, but since you asked ... http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/20...2_137366.shtml http://washingtontimes.com/upi-break...5917-9489r.htm http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/3512088.stm That was easy |
|
03-19-2004, 10:00 AM | #20 | |
Pro Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Sunny South of France
|
Quote:
All I can say to that is F@ckin' sh*t ! I can tell you that this is something that is definitely not advertised over here in France, and especially surprising since we''re supposed to be friends with Taiwan, (read, they buy our weapons...) Very surprising indeed...
__________________
Detroit Vampires (CFL) : Ve 're coming for your blood! Camargue Flamingos (WOOF): pretty in Pink |
|
03-19-2004, 10:32 AM | #21 |
High School Varsity
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Mississippi
|
this could get scary in a hurry if we don't watch out.
__________________
The Dallas Cowboys!! America's Team will rise again. |
03-19-2004, 10:39 AM | #22 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Here
|
WHoever asked if China could not invade Taiwan, that is pretty much correct. They currently do not have the acquatic (sp?) ability to attack Taiwan. They don't have the carriers or ships needed to effectively carry out an attack on Taiwan, and it wouldn't do enough to constantly send missiles at tehm. Kind of like why the buildup to Iraq took a while. We could have easily just bombed the heck out of Iraq, but we needed people there to actually do something.
|
03-19-2004, 11:22 AM | #23 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
|
Quote:
They are in the process of building three carriers and the assocaited groups.The firt one will be out to sea next year. |
|
03-19-2004, 12:11 PM | #24 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Placerville, CA
|
I don't think China would invade Taiwan... I can't imagine the USA would be the only nation to object to this course of action.
|
03-19-2004, 12:26 PM | #25 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: MA
|
But the US would be the only one to do something other than talk.
|
03-19-2004, 12:39 PM | #26 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Placerville, CA
|
Quote:
Eh... I dunno... if China got aggressive, I could see Russia getting involved. |
|
03-19-2004, 01:24 PM | #27 |
College Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkeley
|
Just about 50% of the people in Taiwan are totally against Taiwanese independence, so I think its a little quick to jump to the conclusion that China must be responsible for this.
Secondly, at least from my personal experience visiting China, it seems to me there are so many American companies dependent on China right now that there would be a pretty powerful lobby against any sort of US-China conflict or economic sanctions. |
03-19-2004, 01:41 PM | #28 | |
Coordinator
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Concord, MA/UMass
|
Quote:
Apparently $40 Billion ( http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/fron.../17/2003106520 ) is what it took. |
|
03-19-2004, 02:50 PM | #29 |
College Starter
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Beantown
|
__________________
Boston Bashers - III.14 - (8347) |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|