Front Office Football Central  

Go Back   Front Office Football Central > Archives > FOFC Archive
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Statistics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-04-2003, 10:41 AM   #1
Hands to the Face
n00b
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
OT: MMQB on the Shuttle Program (circa 1980)

MMQB fans among us may enjoy the following, penned in 1980. Apparently, Easterbrook's missive so rankled NASA that the agency drafted a rebuttal. I haven't been able to locate that document.


http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/fea...-fulltext.html

Hands to the Face is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2003, 10:44 AM   #2
Hands to the Face
n00b
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
It occurs to me that MMQB should read TMQB. I'm sure few were confused for long. As the kids say, "My bad."
Hands to the Face is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2003, 11:00 AM   #3
ctmason
High School JV
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Mesa, AZ
I still don't get what TMQB stands for, either.
ctmason is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2003, 11:06 AM   #4
Hands to the Face
n00b
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Someday, when you're old enough, perhaps I will fill you in.

Seriously, though, TMQ stands for "Tuesday Morning Quarterback," a weekly feature in the "Page 2" area of ESPN's website. The column, penned by the tastfully named Gregg Easterbrook, features a wry take on the NFL and other assorted topics of vital national interest, like cheerbabes and factual errors on Star Trek.
Hands to the Face is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2003, 11:19 AM   #5
ctmason
High School JV
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Mesa, AZ
Oh okay, thanks. Never read it before.
ctmason is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2003, 09:13 PM   #6
Barkeep49
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Not too far away
End the Shuttle Program Now

I really hope that we follow what he said more recently in Time and stop the silly waste of money on the shuttle program. I am not sold on continuing a manned space program but if that is something that we as a society are going to do then we need to do a hell of a lot better job and it might mean waiting 10 or 20 or 5 years until we can get up there and do it right.
Barkeep49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:23 PM.



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.