Front Office Football Central  

Go Back   Front Office Football Central > Archives > FOFC Archive
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Statistics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-11-2003, 01:48 PM   #1
Bee
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fairfax, VA
And the floodgates open?

India mulls pre-emptive strike against Pakistan

Bee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2003, 01:54 PM   #2
AgPete
College Prospect
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Holy shit.

I can see it now, other countries will do the exact same thing without U.N. support and when we call them out for it, they're going to go to same card everytime - "Well, you did it!"

If the other countries of the world use this against us, the world is in deep kaka.
AgPete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2003, 02:04 PM   #3
Bee
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fairfax, VA
Well...no one ever got UN support before, so I don't think that's really an issue.

But it does give those who want to be aggressors another card to play IMO.
Bee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2003, 02:06 PM   #4
Fritz
Lethargic Hooligan
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: hello kitty found my wallet at a big tent revival and returned it with all the cash missing
Well, India and Pakistan have never been at war before....
__________________
donkey, donkey, walk a little faster
Fritz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2003, 02:07 PM   #5
Fritz
Lethargic Hooligan
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: hello kitty found my wallet at a big tent revival and returned it with all the cash missing
dola

In war, someone always strikes first.
__________________
donkey, donkey, walk a little faster
Fritz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2003, 02:20 PM   #6
Bee
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fairfax, VA
Quote:
Originally posted by Fritz
dola

In war, someone always strikes first.

But it's usually the bad guy.
Bee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2003, 02:28 PM   #7
Kodos
Resident Alien
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Quote:
Originally posted by Fritz
dola

In war, someone always strikes first.


Not in Rocky 3, where Rocky and Apollo punched eachother at exactly the same time.
Kodos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2003, 02:32 PM   #8
sachmo71
The boy who cried Trout
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: TX
Quote:
Originally posted by Fritz
Well, India and Pakistan have never been at war before....


hehe!
sachmo71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2003, 02:50 PM   #9
Fritz
Lethargic Hooligan
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: hello kitty found my wallet at a big tent revival and returned it with all the cash missing
Quote:
Originally posted by Bee
But it's usually the bad guy.


only by point of view. For instance, much of the Arab world and Andy think the US is the bad guy.
__________________
donkey, donkey, walk a little faster
Fritz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2003, 03:05 PM   #10
JonInMiddleGA
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Behind Enemy Lines in Athens, GA
Hmm ... I'd say that India had been "mulling" a pre-emptive strike against Pakistan for a lot longer than just the past few weeks.
__________________
"I lit another cigarette. Unless I specifically inform you to the contrary, I am always lighting another cigarette." - from a novel by Martin Amis
JonInMiddleGA is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2003, 06:48 PM   #11
JPhillips
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Newburgh, NY
Yeah, but now they are using the US/Iraq issue as an example.
__________________
To love someone is to strive to accept that person exactly the way he or she is, right here and now.. - Mr. Rogers
JPhillips is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2003, 12:01 AM   #12
EagleFan
Hall Of Famer
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Mays Landing, NJ USA
Using it as a feeble example. Unless Pakistan is under a direct mandate to disarm over the past 12 years, and didn't, as a result of invading a neighboring country and being forced out by the UN.
EagleFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2003, 07:44 AM   #13
Bee
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fairfax, VA
Quote:
Originally posted by EagleFan
Using it as a feeble example. Unless Pakistan is under a direct mandate to disarm over the past 12 years, and didn't, as a result of invading a neighboring country and being forced out by the UN.


I thought we invaded to liberate the Iraqi people...err..because the regime has ties to terrorism...err...nevermind, I never can keep up with the reason from day to day.

I guess it depends on what day of the week India were to invade Pakistan if they were doing it for similar reasons.



Seriously, to me that's the cause for concern. Our administration kept changing the justification for this to garner public support and now it's made it much more difficult to dismiss similar claims from countries like India. I also think it will be very difficult politically to sell internationally the ONLY justification for pre-emptive strikes is the EXACT situation we were in with Iraq.
Bee is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:45 PM.



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.