12-13-2007, 11:44 AM | #451 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Appleton, WI
|
To try to better sum up my point, I find it interesting that you claim the polls of "future shoppers" must be wrong because it doesn't match the trend of "current owners". The poll may in fact be wrong, but it doesn't seem to work to equate those two groups of consumers.
|
12-13-2007, 11:47 AM | #452 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Quote:
The problem with a poll like this sometimes has to do with the phrasing of the question. You can get just about any response you like depending on the wording. While the articles about this poll cite the percentages, I haven't seen the actual poll question listed anywhere. Also, many of the respondants, depending on their tech background, may or may not know about the BR capabilities in the PS3. Similarly, due to 'DVD' being in the HD-DVD name, there's a lot of people who are not fully aware of the HD-DVD market that assume that DVD and HD-DVD are the same thing. Certainly can't fault Toshiba for that as it helps their name recognition, but I'm not totally sure that it translates to sales in the end. |
|
12-13-2007, 11:51 AM | #453 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Quote:
The problem in this case is that 'future shoppers' doesn't qualify just how 'ready' these people are to make the jump into the HD movie market. If the majority of these people don't want to make the jump until 12-24 months from now, that's a huge problem for HD-DVD as they need the numbers to come right now. You are right in that these survey numbers are very general and tough to translate. We have to speculate a lot to draw the true meaning of these numbers without the full information that we need. |
|
12-13-2007, 11:51 AM | #454 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fairfax, VA
|
Quote:
The survey isn't about stand-alone players, it's about which format people looking to buy a HD player are favoring. That would include people buying a PS3 just for a BR player. I think in addition to current sales, any executive worth his salt would be tracking future trends as well. Betamax outsold VHS tapes after the first year, but we know how that turned out. |
|
12-13-2007, 11:52 AM | #455 |
College Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkeley
|
The 3 million to 1 million on total players is a little misleading though as some percentage of the 3 million installed BR players won't purchase a BR disc. We can't really use the 300k to 1 million for dedicated players either because we know that a percentage of the PS3s are used as BR players.
The war is still pretty far from over... HDDVD players are now cheap enough to compete against the good upscaling DVD players on price and are really starting to move hardware. We still don't know if the people buying the cheap HDDVD players will buy enough media to make a difference though... if they start buying media, HDDVD could catch up quickly. It looked like it was starting to happen last week, but then BR had the two big releases this week. |
12-13-2007, 11:53 AM | #456 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fairfax, VA
|
Quote:
That was pretty much my point as well. I was surprised by the numbers and that's the reason I posted the survey. |
|
12-13-2007, 11:56 AM | #457 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Quote:
Absolutely, but that battle was very similar to this one. In the end, VHS won because of a key player in the form of the porn industry. Those porn movies single-handedly won that battle because of the high demand for those movies. By the same token, BR has the majority of the movie studios in their court in this battle and may add Warner in the near future. If that's the case, BR will win this battle the same way VHS won its battle: get the movies that people want on your media. |
|
12-13-2007, 11:57 AM | #458 | |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Appleton, WI
|
Quote:
I think everyone is fully aware of how polls can be constructed to elicit a particular response. I think everyone is also fully aware of how statistics can be manipulated to show whatever you want them to show. At least your responses above deal with the poll itself and don't just say that the poll is wrong because future shoppers don't match past shoppers. Of course, you are clearly starting with the assumption that the poll is incorrect... |
|
12-13-2007, 12:04 PM | #459 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Quote:
Polls to me are a way to tilt situations in the favor of one side or another and little more. Similarly, I despise press releases from companies stating percentages rather than giving the hard numbers behind those percentages. A perfect example of that was Sony's press release stating that 'PS3 sales numbers were up 192% over Black Friday weekend'. I didn't post it in the console discussion for a reason. If Sony knows that sales are up 192%, why not just say that they sold XX,XXX consoles instead of use percentages that appear to inflate the results? Similarly, I dislike percentages in polls without the specific question and poll count listed. I feel like they're giving me an incomplete picture of what they're saying. Hard numbers provide a much better situation than any poll. Until those people smack down their hard-earned dollars, their possible sale doesn't do anything for a company. |
|
12-13-2007, 12:16 PM | #460 | |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Appleton, WI
|
Quote:
This is all well and good, but I'm not part of a company - at least not one involved in this industry. I am a (potential) consumer, so I do find thoughts of other potential consumers interesting. I wouldn't make a decision based on just one poll, but I would dismiss it out of hand either. I also wouldn't just use polls but also reviews of current owners. |
|
12-13-2007, 12:23 PM | #461 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fairfax, VA
|
Quote:
I was just looking at the numbers and was surprised BR didn't have a larger lead in exclusive titles. Currently BR has 268 exclusive titles and HD-DVD has 210. In my mind BR had a much bigger lead than that. |
|
12-13-2007, 12:27 PM | #462 | |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Appleton, WI
|
Quote:
Is there a website somewhere listing the different studios and their current status (exclusive/shared) with different formats? As HD is still in an early adopter phase, I'm curious how the studios line up with respect to catalogs enticing to early adopters. |
|
12-13-2007, 12:36 PM | #463 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Quote:
Remember that HD-DVD came out 6 months earlier than BR. HD-DVD had quite a few exclusive titles right off the bat when the technology was introduced. The margin of exclusive titles is wider than that in favor of BR since the head-to-head battle began. Last edited by Mizzou B-ball fan : 12-13-2007 at 12:38 PM. |
|
12-13-2007, 12:45 PM | #464 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Quote:
Here's a list of the exclusive studios (Warner is the only remaining neutral 'big' studio): BR: Lionsgate Sony Fox Disney HD-DVD: Paramount/Dreamworks Universal |
|
12-13-2007, 01:16 PM | #465 | |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Appleton, WI
|
Quote:
Interestingly, if WB ever decided to go exclusive to HD-DVD, this would be the same breakdown as during the DVD/DIVX format war with BR having the same studios as DIVX. This is meaningless since DIVX was a different business model while BR is just a different format, but it is still interesting. |
|
12-13-2007, 01:44 PM | #466 | |
Pro Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Fairfax, VA
|
Quote:
Yes, but I no longer have the website opened up. I think the name was something like blu-ray statistics dot com or something like that. (Sorry I can't be of more help). The website actually gave all the studios (beyond the major ones that MBBF posted above) and how many releases they each have. |
|
12-13-2007, 01:51 PM | #467 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Quote:
Yep, here's the sites you're referring to....... hxxp://www.hddvdstats.com hxxp://www.blu-raystats.com |
|
12-13-2007, 02:04 PM | #468 |
College Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkeley
|
Adding in percentage of market:
BR: Lionsgate - 4.2% Sony - 13.7% Fox - 9.5% Disney - 13.5% TOTAL: 40.9% HD-DVD: Paramount/Dreamworks - 16.5% Universal - 12.0% TOTAL: 28.5% Warner Bros is worth 13.4% to whoever can get it (if it does go exclusive). (admittedly this is based on box office sales in 2007, and not DVD sales, but it should be a solid proxy and was easy to find.) |
12-13-2007, 02:23 PM | #469 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Quote:
Part of the problem for HD-DVD thus far this year has been Universal's lack of big hits. They've spent most of the year without a top 20 sales title. It's one of the major reasons why the Paramount/Dreamworks deal was so big for Toshiba to stay in the race. They got instant sales hits with Transformers and Shrek the Third, something Universal was having trouble doing. |
|
12-13-2007, 02:31 PM | #470 |
Death Herald
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Le stelle la notte sono grandi e luminose nel cuore profondo del Texas
|
Something to ponder as well in the race for studios is indeed which studios are currently doing well at the box office. Since current next-gen players do a great job of upconverting existing DVD titles, there isn't much impetus for people to repurchase titles they currently own. They are going to purchase next-gen media going forward. And the past couple of years, there have only been a handful of great movies to come out, and with the small install base of next gen players, that small sample size can make it look like one format or the other has a great advantage.
It is almost impossible to determine based on the numbers that are out there, but I would be very interested to see the total sales figures for all non-exclusive titles from Warner Bros. and see if they mirror the two to one or three to one BR over HD-DVD overall figures.
__________________
Thinkin' of a master plan 'Cuz ain't nuthin' but sweat inside my hand So I dig into my pocket, all my money is spent So I dig deeper but still comin' up with lint |
12-13-2007, 03:04 PM | #471 |
Grey Dog Software
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Phoenix, AZ by way of Belleville, IL
|
I went to two Best Buys and one Target last night looking for the Blu-ray version of the HP box set. None of the four stores had any, but the Best Buys still had a ton of the HD-DVD version. It's a tiny sample, but I had the guy at BB check other stores for the HP box blu-ray and only 1 had one (and it was across the city). It could be because more HD-DVDs were made, but it's certainly a lot tougher to find the Blu-Ray version (I ended up ordering it from Amazon).
I also wonder about the PS3. Both myself and three guys from work all trade Blu-Ray titles to watch (and I get much of mine from rentals on BB.com). None of us have a "stand alone" player, we all have PS3s - but I bet we own about 40-50 Blu-Ray DVDs all together. IMO, most of the people that have purchased a PS3 in the past 2 years had to have done so with Blu-Ray on the brain. I own both a 360 and PS3 (and a Wii) and there is no reason I would have purchased the PS3 over the 360 if I had to choose just on gaming. In fact, if it didn't have a Blu-Ray, I would not have bought it at all. |
12-13-2007, 03:17 PM | #472 |
College Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkeley
|
For Amazon at least it looks like the HD-DVD version of Order of Phoenix is selling more than the Blu-Ray version, but for the box set its reversed:
http://www.amazon.com/gp/bestsellers..._zg_hrsr_d_3_4 |
12-17-2007, 03:38 PM | #473 |
Hall Of Famer
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: the yo'
|
dunno if this is Sears exclusive, or if it's nation wide w/ other retailers.
Buy a 46" W series(2299) or a 52" W Series(2999) and get the basic sony blu ray player for free. Buy the 40" for 1750 and get the player for 199.99. As a stand alone, the player is 299 at sears this week. Finally moved my 2nd and 3rd blu ray players at work this week(in a year)...my personal next gen dvd war now stands at BD:3, HDDVD:2. |
12-20-2007, 07:40 AM | #474 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Quote:
New numbers for week ending December 16th are in. Looks like the first Harry Potter week went to Blu-ray with a 61% to 39% advantage. More info concerning the specific titles should be in soon, but it appears that the new Bourne movie on HD-DVD didn't nearly as well as they expected. |
|
12-20-2007, 07:43 AM | #475 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Quote:
I'm not sure that it's nationwide yet, but several retailers are offering free BR players with a Bravia TV purchase. There are now 2 Blu-ray stand-alone players at the $299 price point. |
|
12-20-2007, 03:38 PM | #476 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkeley
|
Quote:
Link? (funny that you have to be asked for a link as you're the one always harping on it.) I usually get it from engadget and they specifically mentioned a lack of numbers so far in the most recent post. |
|
12-20-2007, 03:39 PM | #477 |
College Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkeley
|
DOLA, the few numbers they have contradict your post... according to them Bourne outsold Harry Potter 2-to-1 on HD-DVD.
http://www.engadgethd.com/2007/12/20...-sales-charts/ Last edited by Daimyo : 12-20-2007 at 03:40 PM. |
12-21-2007, 10:19 PM | #478 | ||
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Quote:
Info is actually from a poster over on the Hi-Def Digest message board. He always posts the numbers a few days before they are released by Nielsen. He evidently works for them or has someone feed him the numbers. Here's the text from his post: Quote:
|
||
12-28-2007, 02:26 PM | #479 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
New numbers for Week ending December 23rd were leaked. Blu-ray wins the week by a 61-39 margin.
Quote:
|
|
01-02-2008, 01:21 PM | #480 |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Great new deals on HD movies at Amazon. Buy one, get one free deal on HD-DVD's......
http://www.amazon.com/gp/feature.htm...rd_i=193642011 Blu-ray appears to have the better buy one, get one free this time around. Harry Potter movies are included in the latest BR deal, meaning you can pick up all 4 Harry Potter movies in HD for around $40 shipped. http://www.amazon.com/gp/feature.htm...rd_i=193640011 |
01-02-2008, 01:42 PM | #481 |
College Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkeley
|
The Harry Potter HDDVDs were originally included in the HDDVD BOGO, but not anymore.
In fact last week the HDDVD versions of the first four Harry Potter movies ranked 1-4 in Amazon's DVD rankings (not just HD discs, but among all DVD, HDDVD, and BR). No HD disc had ever ranked #1 on Amazon's sales charts before with 300 coming closest at #2 during its release week. |
01-02-2008, 01:42 PM | #482 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: NYC
|
The HP movies were available, among others, in the HD-DVD format a few days ago but were removed from the list.
|
01-02-2008, 01:43 PM | #483 |
College Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkeley
|
DOLA...
heh, now that the BR versions are BOGO they've duplicated the feat. http://www.amazon.com/gp/bestsellers...f=pd_dp_ts_d_1 |
01-02-2008, 01:51 PM | #484 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Quote:
Yeah, the BOGO deals on both format have really helped the sales numbers on both formats to the point where they are competitive even against some of the DVD counterparts. It's hard to beat getting 2 HD movies for $20. The DVD versions cost that much, if not more. |
|
01-02-2008, 03:14 PM | #485 |
Head Coach
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Green Bay, WI
|
I'm trying to refrain from buying the HP's right now. I'd love to have them at that price, but I really shouldn't spend the money right this moment.
|
01-02-2008, 04:46 PM | #486 |
College Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkeley
|
BR has actually had BOGO deals several times over the last year (and not just limited to Amazon like this one)... Many point to them as one of the factors fueling BR's disc sales lead. HDDVD is just recently, finally starting to get into the game.
|
01-03-2008, 07:29 AM | #487 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Interesting article discussing how little 'suggested retail price' factors into the buying decision of a retail purchaser.........
http://www.thedigitalbits.com/articl...ial010108.html Quote:
|
|
01-03-2008, 09:05 AM | #488 |
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Appleton, WI
|
Is this the same guy at The Digital Bits that chastised Toshiba for the Black Friday sales because they should just be giving up so Blu-Ray can win and the format war will end? I was a big fan of The Digital Bits during the early days of DVD but they have turned into such a group of Sony/Blu-Ray fanboys that I refuse to visit the site anymore. They may still deal in decent facts, but they have lost the appearance of objectivity.
|
01-03-2008, 09:08 AM | #489 |
College Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkeley
|
|
01-03-2008, 09:12 AM | #490 |
Death Herald
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Le stelle la notte sono grandi e luminose nel cuore profondo del Texas
|
That columnist must have failed Macroeconomics 101.
__________________
Thinkin' of a master plan 'Cuz ain't nuthin' but sweat inside my hand So I dig into my pocket, all my money is spent So I dig deeper but still comin' up with lint |
01-03-2008, 09:18 AM | #491 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Quote:
Pretty sure that was the founder of the site. The writer of this editorial is not the same person, though you are correct that it is the same website. I think that article was written out of frustration more than anything else. This format war has gone on far longer than it ever should have gone. Last edited by Mizzou B-ball fan : 01-03-2008 at 09:23 AM. |
|
01-03-2008, 09:21 AM | #492 |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Why do you say that? Hard to agree or disagree with you since you didn't give specifics. Which parts do you believe to be inaccurate? It should be noted that this is an editorial, however, that doesn't give the writer a license to put incorrect information in his article if you believe that to be the case. |
01-03-2008, 09:28 AM | #493 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Quote:
Herein lies the sudden quandry that is faced. The constant argument from the HD-DVD camp has been that the PS3 doesn't have any effect on BR disc sales. As I mentioned before, I think it does have some effect, though not nearly as direct as the sale of a stand-alone player. If the new HD-DVD 360 comes to pass at CES 2008, that argument is pretty much out the window as they would appear to be conceding that a packaged HD media drive does have an effect on sales, hence the reason they're including it in the 360. In that case, the comparison becomes apples to apples and that reasoning is no longer applicable to the argument. |
|
01-03-2008, 09:35 AM | #494 | |
Death Herald
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Le stelle la notte sono grandi e luminose nel cuore profondo del Texas
|
Quote:
Anyone with understanding of Macroeconomics can see the holes in the editorial. He says that the reason people can't buy VHS players anymore is because stores don't sell them. If he left it at that, it'd be ok. But he rationalized it by saying that demand went away when they were pulled from the shelves. In reality, demand had been waning for quite sometime, and when it was no longer cost effective to keep them in stock, the big box retailers pulled them. That is why trying to use that analogy to compare Blu-Ray/HD-DVD is false. Both camps volume of sales are growing, and keeping about the 1.5 to 1 title sales ratio between the two on increasing sales each month. But by his own admission, the amount of shelf space devoted to the two groups is in far excess of their piece of the overall market. DVD players and titles are still far outpacing those of high-def players. To say the big box retailers are going to dump HD-DVD, when the sales are still growing, goes against his whole argument. A big reason Blu-ray had more shelf space recently is because they were paying for it, not because of a great uptick in consumer demand or because the big box retailers were trying to deep six HD-DVD.
__________________
Thinkin' of a master plan 'Cuz ain't nuthin' but sweat inside my hand So I dig into my pocket, all my money is spent So I dig deeper but still comin' up with lint |
|
01-03-2008, 09:57 AM | #495 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Quote:
I'd generally agree with most of this except for the last set of statements. While comment about shelf space and Sony paying for it is correct, that's part of the price of doing business and it will cause an increase in business (they're not adding that shelf space just for looks). For that matter, if Paramount/Dreamworks wasn't paid for HD-DVD exclusivity, this format war WOULD be all but over. I'd also generally agree that the retailers tend to react to trends. Currently, several of the major HDTV companies are offering free BR players (PS3 is one of those options) with the purchase of a HDTV. No similar offers exist for HD-DVD. I have no doubts that Sony is assisting with that as well, but that's another deal that's going to increase their installed base. |
|
01-03-2008, 10:00 AM | #496 | |
College Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkeley
|
Quote:
The thing is there is room for the middle ground. PS3s obviously don't count equally as standalone players and they obviously don't count for nothing. They count as some percentage of a standalone player. Saying BR players outsold HDDVD players 2 to 1 is worthless since almost all those BR players were PS3s. For example, assume 90% of the BR player sales were PS3s and a PS3 counts as 20% of a standalone player (in terms of HDM consumption)... that 2 to 1 ratio now becomes 0.56 to 1 and what appeared to be a huge "win" for BR is actually a huge win for HDDVD. In that scenario each PS3 would have to count as 44% of a standalone player for BR player sales to be even... |
|
01-03-2008, 10:50 AM | #497 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Quote:
I agree that including the PS3's fully isn't any better than comparing the stand-alone players and declaring HD-DVD in the lead. In an ideal situation, assigning a percentage would work well. But there's no way to measure that ratio accurately. You could get a poll, but the margin of error would be pretty large in this situation. Also, the percentage of PS3 owners who do use it for movie purposes will likely go up as adoption rates increase, so it's a moving target. With that not being a viable option, the next best measure is movie sales. As much as people like to talk about the installed bases (no matter which way you measure it), the real profit/royalties are made on the unit sales, especially when it reaches a mass market level similar to DVD, hence the reason that the sooner this format war is over, the better it is for the companies involved. Last edited by Mizzou B-ball fan : 01-03-2008 at 10:53 AM. |
|
01-03-2008, 11:01 AM | #498 |
College Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Berkeley
|
Unfortunately disc sales numbers are heavily influenced by discounts and BOGOs so they're also a bit unreliable... the best measure would be adjusted sales that only count discs paid for (ie, BOGO count as a single sale instead of as two sales).
BR has "won" every week this year, but at least one week (Transformers) the only reason they won was because of a Disney BOGO sale. I'm sure the studios are much more interested in profits than raw unit sales... unfortunately those numbers don't get released. |
01-03-2008, 11:08 AM | #499 |
Coordinator
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Puyallup, WA
|
Sony has also been much more aggressive with the BOGO offers and Walmart numbers are not included so there's no way anyone can say the 1.5-1 is an accurate reflection of movie sales.
Its safe to say the sales numbers are closer than 1.5-1, but its impossible to know how much closer. |
01-03-2008, 11:18 AM | #500 | |
General Manager
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kansas City, MO
|
Quote:
I agree that those sales influence the numbers, but you can't discount that purchase just because it was a sale. Sales are created to move units. They're moving units to try to win the format war. I didn't see anyone commenting how the sales of the $99 HD-DVD players should be discounted as not full sales because they were clearance priced to significantly boost the number of stand-alone HD-DVD players. It would be just as silly to state that 150-180K of the HD-DVD units don't count because they were sold at well under the suggested retail price. Those sales aren't dirty pool nor are they inaccurate numbers. That's the price of doing business and beating out your competitor. You take the smaller profits now with the long term goal of winning the war and making lots of money in a year or two. Dismissing sales because they were sold at a reduced profit or break-even is a very weak stance. Last edited by Mizzou B-ball fan : 01-03-2008 at 11:19 AM. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
|
|