WW LXV-- Enter the CUBICLE (GAME OVER! See Post #1625 For Final Game Post)

[The Jackal]

Problem is, fink could just be a department worker who's been busy and hasn't checked in. That happens a lot, and then all this finger pointing leads to nothing. But I sort of agree with heinze, it's somewhat better to lynch an inactive villager that you hope is a wolf.

[RendeR]

Come on kids, I am not a wolf, I have no real value other than keeping the numbers up in the cubicles for the good guys. Lynch me if you really feel you must, but it gains us nothing. long term it could cost us the win.

[claphamsa]

Originally Posted by RendeR

UNVOTE SNDVLS

VOTE FINK

purely self preservation here. I have to force a tie. Lets see who moves next. Do they save me? Do they same Fink? Since I tied it, if they save Fink, methinks we find a wolf in the vote.

i htink with 6 for you and 6 fot fink the odds we get no wolfes in either is somewhere between 0 and my chances with lyndsy lohan!

[Passacaglia]

Originally Posted by claphamsa

i htink with 6 for you and 6 fot fink the odds we get no wolfes in either is somewhere between 0 and my chances with lyndsy lohan!

So the odds of getting no wolves is 0 -- i.e. we will definitely get a wolf?

[mauchow]

Originally Posted by Passacaglia

Is there some kind of argument that's tempted you? I don't even think finkster has shown up since you said that's what would cause you to switch.

I was pretty much 50/50 on who to vote for. I like the way Heinz thinks and if he is a fellow plain worker then he'd be the first person I'd follow, to be honest. He's a good player from what I've seen(aside from his luck). No big basis, really.

[RendeR]

*gooses Farrah*

"Hey darlin, lets you and mo go check out the copy room, hell it might be my last night here, and your last best hope for......."

[claphamsa]

Originally Posted by Passacaglia

So the odds of getting no wolves is 0 -- i.e. we will definitely get a wolf?

12 people voting..... 18 active players...... a minimum of one of those 12 will be a wolf,..... thats all.

[Farrah Whitworth-Rahn]

Originally Posted by RendeR

*gooses Farrah*

"Hey darlin, lets you and mo go check out the copy room, hell it might be my last night here, and your last best hope for......."

Sexual harrassment. I haven't voted yet....ballsy.

[st.cronin]

Originally Posted by claphamsa

thats how i read it tooooooo but how about lycnh a wold AND get info??????????????????????????????????????????????

If you see a way to do this, I'm all for it.

[RendeR]

Originally Posted by Farrah Whitworth-Rahn

Sexual harrassment. I haven't voted yet....ballsy.

Hey I'm just a working "Stiff", You want some Scotch?

[The Jackal]

Originally Posted by st.cronin

If you see a way to do this, I'm all for it.

I think clap is saying that having votes on different people generates info, at the very least voting patterns, whereas everyone voting for one person doesn't show much as far as voting patterns go, so even if it was a wolf (which would be great), nothing would be revealed about anyone else.

But the other thing is, yeah, if people feel strongly about who are wolves, they should vote for those people, not others just to make votes close.

[mauchow]

I miss out on Farrah in the copier room AND the closet during the wedding. This blows!

[claphamsa]

its easy cronin, just dont all pile on........


I have nothing wrong with lynching render.....

but at least try and disceren some patterns!

and I just realized that my spell checker does not work on this site for some reason!

Originally Posted by st.cronin

If you see a way to do this, I'm all for it.

[claphamsa]

unvote latham
vote render.....

[mauchow]

Another tie?

[st.cronin]

I think Render is in the lead, by 1 or 2. Let me update my count...

[Alan T]

Originally Posted by st.cronin

I think Render is in the lead, by 1 or 2. Let me update my count...

I think its actually a tie, but fink hasn't done his self preservation vote yet (which I assume will happen eventually) , so technically Render by 1

[Farrah Whitworth-Rahn]

Alright I've thrown my vote away when it was tied before. Raiders Army wasn't so happy last time, so I'm going to give Arlie the benefit of the doubt here.

VOTE RENDER

[RendeR]

Originally Posted by claphamsa

unvote latham
vote render.....

ok you broke the tie, give us a reason, why me over Fink?

[The Jackal]

Originally Posted by Alan T

I think its actually a tie, but fink hasn't done his self preservation vote yet (which I assume will happen eventually) , so technically Render by 1

He has less than half an hour, I don't know if thats an assumption we can make anymore.

[The Jackal]

Originally Posted by RendeR

ok you broke the tie, give us a reason, why me over Fink?

Yes I'd like to hear about that too.

[st.cronin]

Render (7)-- Arles (361), Mr. Wednesday (396), oliegirl (403), mauboy1 (408), Passacaglia (410), claphamsa (514), Farrah Whitworth-Rahn (518)
finkenst (6)-- jeheinz72 (360), path12 (377), The Jackal (414), Lathum (426), SnDvls (489), Render (491)
Lathum (1)-- bsak16 (395)
SnDvls (1)-- ntndeacon (392)
Farrah Whitworth-Rahn (1)-- st.cronin (346)
jeheinz72 (1)-- Alan T (349)

[RendeR]

Same for you Farrah, why me over Fink? And don't you dare complain about the copy room, I KNOW you enjoyed that!

[st.cronin]

Anybody know the tiebreaker rules?

[claphamsa]

Originally Posted by Farrah Whitworth-Rahn

Alright I've thrown my vote away when it was tied before. Raiders Army wasn't so happy last time, so I'm going to give Arlie the benefit of the doubt here.

VOTE RENDER

homer!!!!

[Alan T]

Originally Posted by The Jackal

He has less than half an hour, I don't know if thats an assumption we can make anymore.

I haven't played WW before with him, so wasn't sure how into it he gets. I've been on a bit of a break from it for a few months. I wouldn't assume he was going to miss the vote when his butt is on the line unless he was the type who kind of zoned out when they got a meaningless role and no one really to warn him. I've seen a few players like that before. I've learned though with WW never assume anything, as anything can happen even in the last few minutes.

[st.cronin]

not voted: finkenst, Schmidty

[claphamsa]

Originally Posted by RendeR

ok you broke the tie, give us a reason, why me over Fink?

your around... Ill give him one day to show up and say something. life happens sometime. if he doesnt make an impact tommorow I will gladly vote him.

and you made me look bad a coupel games ago

[Mr. Wednesday]

Originally Posted by st.cronin

Anybody know the tiebreaker rules?

Keep in mind that a supposed tie isn't, necessarily. (And consequently, it's not necessarily bad to have a tie.)

[RendeR]

Here's hoping Fink is a temp.....

[Schmidty]

This sucks. I don't think any of this analysis means crap, and I don't really have a reason to vote for anyone.

[RendeR]

Originally Posted by claphamsa

your around... Ill give him one day to show up and say something. life happens sometime. if he doesnt make an impact tommorow I will gladly vote him.

and you made me look bad a coupel games ago

You? man I make everyone look bad. ShiiiiiiiiT, The difference in this office between you and me? I make this suit look GOOOD!

[st.cronin]

Originally Posted by Mr. Wednesday

Keep in mind that a supposed tie isn't, necessarily. (And consequently, it's not necessarily bad to have a tie.)

What does this mean?

From the rules:

Any ties will be broken with a hidden mechanism.

[The Jackal]

Originally Posted by Schmidty

This sucks. I don't think any of this analysis means crap, and I don't really have a reason to vote for anyone.

I hear that. The first few days are really about luck. Then when you get to the last few days, hopefully you've knocked off at least one baddie, and that's when vote histories -sometimes- and i stress the sometimes, lead to other baddies.

[RendeR]

Originally Posted by st.cronin

What does this mean?

From the rules:

it means there are people who automatically have -1 or +1 vote for them already, before voting begins, so an obvious tie, may NOT be an actual one.

[Farrah Whitworth-Rahn]

Originally Posted by RendeR

Same for you Farrah, why me over Fink? And don't you dare complain about the copy room, I KNOW you enjoyed that!

I quite enjoyed the copy room, and I will smack down anyone who daresay otherwise.

I didn't want to throw my vote away again. I've done so in just about every WW vote I've had. Arlie presented well reasoned and somewhat convincing arguments.

I will say this - if he was wrong, I'm voting to lynch him next. He obviously didn't learn his lesson the last time, and deserves to get beaten.

[Mr. Wednesday]

Temps have a hidden vote on them, the boss's buddies start with a hidden vote in their favor. In the event of an apparent tie, if it's a boss's buddy (the "good" roles) vs. someone else, it actually won't be a tie and the non-buddy will get tossed.

[Farrah Whitworth-Rahn]

Originally Posted by Schmidty

This sucks. I don't think any of this analysis means crap, and I don't really have a reason to vote for anyone.

Why don't you think it means anything?

[RendeR]

Originally Posted by Farrah Whitworth-Rahn

I quite enjoyed the copy room, and I will smack down anyone who daresay otherwise.

I didn't want to throw my vote away again. I've done so in just about every WW vote I've had. Arlie presented well reasoned and somewhat convincing arguments.

I will say this - if he was wrong, I'm voting to lynch him next. He obviously didn't learn his lesson the last time, and deserves to get beaten.

I thinkI'm in Luuuuuuuuvvvvv.

[The Jackal]

Meh, you clearly don't know how to romance a lady. It's about the supply closet, not the copy room. Everyone knows that. Or the elevator that "accidentally" stalls.

[Schmidty]

Ok, I've read everything, but still have no idea who to vote for.

I have 15 minutes. Can anyone give me a short, concise pitch regarding my target?

[RendeR]

Originally Posted by The Jackal

Meh, you clearly don't know how to romance a lady. It's about the supply closet, not the copy room. Everyone knows that. Or the elevator that "accidentally" stalls.

You poor poor lacky of a man, do you not realize the power of a machine operating under a woman's arse?


its all about the GOOOOOOD Vib-rations....my friend....

[The Jackal]

Originally Posted by Schmidty

Ok, I've read everything, but still have no idea who to vote for.

I have 15 minutes. Can anyone give me a short, concise pitch regarding my target?

I think it depends on whether you believe Render and whether you think fink's lack of activity warrants a lynch. There isn't much as far as solid information goes.

[Alan T]

Originally Posted by Schmidty

Ok, I've read everything, but still have no idea who to vote for.

I have 15 minutes. Can anyone give me a short, concise pitch regarding my target?

Arlie gave some reasoning (I don't remember any of it) why he felt Render was a good choice based on day 1 voting behavior.

Fink is a popular choice due to not having shown up today and a throw away vote yesterday.

If you vote Fink, it ends in a tie (as far as we know), and we are at the mercy of a tiebreaker. If you vote Render, he pretty surely gets fired.

[The Jackal]

Originally Posted by RendeR

You poor poor lacky of a man, do you not realize the power of a machine operating under a woman's arse?


its all about the GOOOOOOD Vib-rations....my friend....

I don't need a machine to do my work for me.

[st.cronin]

Originally Posted by Schmidty

Ok, I've read everything, but still have no idea who to vote for.

I have 15 minutes. Can anyone give me a short, concise pitch regarding my target?

Wish I could.

[Passacaglia]

So...is fink going to show up?

[Schmidty]

Originally Posted by Farrah Whitworth-Rahn

Why don't you think it means anything?

Because we have one day of "stats", and 10,000 groups (I love hyperbole) out to get each other. I've played many, many games, and one thing I've always noticed is that 90% of the time in the first 3 days, the "analysis" done by people is less analysis and more "save-my-own-ass-sysis" (good guys and bad).

[RendeR]

Originally Posted by The Jackal

I don't need a machine to do my work for me.

Work? see this is why you fail so badly, its not work, its a pleasure, especially with Farrah, she's one fine piece of......







*runs*

[Alan T]

Originally Posted by Schmidty

"save-my-own-ass-sysis"

It usually doesnt take me long to remember why I like playing with Schmidty in these.