WW LXVII - Heroes (GAME OVER! HEROES WIN!)

[nfg22]

Can we get some Katsup with da Omelette? I say a five ingredient omelette is gooooood.

[Barkeep49]

Originally Posted by nfg22

Another question, GRF will be crucial. I am not saying he is a wolf at all but whatever he votes will most likely decide things.

His vote could be crucial but so could a late vote switch. I'm not convinced at all that GRF will cast the deciding vote.

[Neon_Chaos]

Circumstances, of course, dictate that I will be moving my vote. I could vote for Thomkal, Jackal, or ae. Seeing as ae will be moving his vote soon, I won't be placing my vote on him (he'll just place it on me and create a tie.) I don't really buy the Alan T / Pass fight, so I won't be voting for Thomkal.

I have no idea how I was suddenly on the block, but that leaves me voting for the last guy left.

Unvote No Lynch
Vote The Jackal

[Thomkal]

so will revealing who I am (a hero) be a wise move or not at this point? With all the vote changes I'm not sure if I should do it or not.

[Neon_Chaos]

I suggest you hold off a bit about revealing, Thomkal. The Jackal is ahead on votes, I believe.

[Barkeep49]

Originally Posted by Thomkal

so will revealing who I am (a hero) be a wise move or not at this point? With all the vote changes I'm not sure if I should do it or not.

Giving your hero name at this point would prove you're not Sylar but not clear you of being Company so I don't see it really helping you.

[Lathum]

Originally Posted by Barkeep49

Giving your hero name at this point would prove you're not Sylar .

how do you know that?

[Greyroofoo]

when in hell did my vote come so important?

[Mr. Wednesday]

Originally Posted by oliegirl

3. As for Mr. Wednesdays vote on me b/c I was quiet yesterday - I got some very bad, devastating news about my father yesterday, there is a thread in GD where I'm asking for prayers...I went into shut down mode and was not in a frame of mind to deal with anything yesterday, let alone a WW game. I'm here today, a bit shell shocked so I can't guarantee that I'm going to be overly vocal, but I will be staying in the game and will certainly contribute when I have something to say.

I was in WW before I was in Off Topic. If I'd done it in the other order, I would never have voted for you.

[Barkeep49]

Originally Posted by Lathum

how do you know that?

You're right it wouldn't prove it absolutely but Sylar would be telling a HELL of a risk picking a name from the list which another player, more likely than not, already has. I just don't see Sylar taking that chance.

[Barkeep49]

Originally Posted by Greyroofoo

when in hell did my vote come so important?

When you became the last player to cast a vote in a very tight race .

[nfg22]

Originally Posted by Greyroofoo

when in hell did my vote come so important?

Wait...Wait...Now!!!

[Lathum]

Originally Posted by Barkeep49

You're right it wouldn't prove it absolutely but Sylar would be telling a HELL of a risk picking a name from the list which another player, more likely than not, already has. I just don't see Sylar taking that chance.

again, where does it say that sylar wasn't given an alias, or that sylar has a list of who is in the game?

[nfg22]

Well I am out till midnight. See yall. May the company die!!!

[Mr. Wednesday]

I think the no-lynchers aren't bad, just misguided. As long as the vote is on a non-bad guy, the bad guys want a lynch because it helps them win.

UNVOTE Oliegirl
VOTE The Jackal

[Barkeep49]

Originally Posted by Lathum

again, where does it say that sylar wasn't given an alias, or that sylar has a list of who is in the game?

JH stated as much earlier on.

[hoopsguy]

Wow - this got really interesting really quickly. I have zero idea how to interpret this movement at a quick glance.

[st.cronin]

Originally Posted by Mr. Wednesday

I think the no-lynchers aren't bad, just misguided.

I tend to agree with this. I'm not so much suspicious of people voting no-lynch, as I am exasperated.

[Alan T]

Originally Posted by Lathum

again, where does it say that sylar wasn't given an alias, or that sylar has a list of who is in the game?

Here is Jeheinz quote regarding it. Although there was some debate between people regarding to how it was worded and it's true meaning.

Originally Posted by jeheinz72

There will be a good amount more names than players, but he won't be told a name that isn't in the game.

[DaddyTorgo]

i've got like 20 mins where i have a window to change my vote here...hmmm

[Lathum]

Originally Posted by Barkeep49

JH stated as much earlier on.

I must have missed that, can you show me where?

[path12]

Originally Posted by Lathum

I find this mini run on neon chaos odd.

Me too. And I was part of it.

[Lathum]

Originally Posted by hoopsguy

Wow - this got really interesting really quickly. I have zero idea how to interpret this movement at a quick glance.

it did. Just looking at when the votes came it seems like a movement to save thomkal and possibly ardent

[path12]

Originally Posted by Neon_Chaos

In case you haven't read through most of the thread, I did point out the reasons why I chose to vote that way. I was simply doing it because it was safer for the village rather than casting a blind vote on someone at that point in time.

I also said that I would probably be switching my vote once a race has been established, if the No Lynch vote doesn't gain any momentum.

Well, I do read the thread and I did see your reasoning. But that doesn't mean I either agree or still found it off for you to follow the initial no lynch vote so quickly, especially since you know as well as any of us how ineffective a two day no lynch by the village is.

[path12]

Originally Posted by Lathum

I find this mini run on neon chaos odd.

Actually, looking back on the posts where votes were made I find the run on Ardent a little more pronounced than the Neon one.

[Greyroofoo]

can i ask for a vote count?

[path12]

Originally Posted by Lathum

it did. Just looking at when the votes came it seems like a movement to save thomkal and possibly ardent

I don't get the Thomkal votes at all. There is nothing I've seen that makes him a vote for today.

[path12]

Dola, so if from that standpoint it makes my vote seem like a save for him then so be it.

[Greyroofoo]

and why the two recent votes for the Jackal?

[The Jackal]

Well, crap. I'm at work and just got caught up. There's really no reason to have all these votes on me. Someone decided to put a few on me yesterday and because of that I'm about to be lynched? I'm a hero, albeit not an extremely powerful one but I definitely have a useful role, and getting rid of me would be a very poor idea. I don't want to vote for no lynch but I will if this run on me doesn't go away.

[Neon_Chaos]

Originally Posted by path12

Well, I do read the thread and I did see your reasoning. But that doesn't mean I either agree or still found it off for you to follow the initial no lynch vote so quickly, especially since you know as well as any of us how ineffective a two day no lynch by the village is.

No, I don't know how ineffective it is. I can't remember being involved in a two-day no lynch where everyone had powers. A mitigating factor why I chose the no lynch rout was because we all had powers.

If this were a normal WW game, a no-lynch for day 2 would be a big no-no. Why? Because it would be more practical to potentially sacrifice a regular villager in order to weed out the wolves. The chance of lynching someone with a helpful power would be remote.

But in a game where everyone had powers? It's to our advantage that we keep as many of us alive as long as possible, specially when we're still flying blind in order to be able to benefit more from everyone's powers.

[st.cronin]

Originally Posted by path12

I don't get the Thomkal votes at all. There is nothing I've seen that makes him a vote for today.

I think the Thomkal votes are residual from the pass/alan day 1 thing that either was resolved or wasn't resolved but which I'm frankly a little afraid to bring up.

[st.cronin]

I admit I am not familiar with the case against the Jackal at all.

[Greyroofoo]

Originally Posted by The Jackal

Well, crap. I'm at work and just got caught up. There's really no reason to have all these votes on me. Someone decided to put a few on me yesterday and because of that I'm about to be lynched? I'm a hero, albeit not an extremely powerful one but I definitely have a useful role, and getting rid of me would be a very poor idea. I don't want to vote for no lynch but I will if this run on me doesn't go away.

i'm personally interested in a tie if i don't see why people voted for ya

[The Jackal]

I don't really have anything against you, Neon, but I have to do this because of what you did.

Unvote Thomkal

Vote Neon Chaos

[The Jackal]

Originally Posted by st.cronin

I admit I am not familiar with the case against the Jackal at all.

I think it's just the fact that there were a few votes put on me on day 1, and since we've got no real direction on day 2, people returned to someone who'd been voted in day 1. I believe the original reason someone put a vote on me is because I remarked that being the sylar would be cool, a statement which I will never retract, because I think it'd be fun to be that role, but that really shouldn't get me lynched. Waste of a day if it happens like that.

[Neon_Chaos]

I understand, Jackal. Quid pro quo.

Thomkal, Jackal, if all three of us move to No Lynch, then we can potentially diffuse this ridiculous situation.

[jeheinz72]

Jackal (6): hoopsguy (489), nfg22 (498), Thomkal (520), Barkeep (529), Neon Chaos (553), Mr. Wednesday (565)

Neon Chaos (5): mauboy1 (471), RendeR (499), path12 (511), Daddy Torgo (530), Jackal (585)

Ardent (4): St. Cronin (328), SnDvls (487), Alan T (512), Oliegirl (518)

Thomkal (3): claphamsa (318), Chief Rum (434), Lathum (474)

No Lynch (3): Narcizo (445), Ardent (452), Schmidty (488)


Not voting: Greyroofoo

[DaddyTorgo]

Originally Posted by Neon_Chaos

I understand, Jackal. Quid pro quo.

Thomkal, Jackal, if all three of us move to No Lynch, then we can potentially diffuse this ridiculous situation.

that would certainly raise eyebrows. linking yourself to the two of them is either risky or ballsy, or puts a big target on the three of you.

[Greyroofoo]

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo

that would certainly raise eyebrows. linking yourself to the two of them is either risky or ballsy, or puts a big target on the three of you.

maybe thomkal, but jackal and neon saving their skins doesn't make one a wolf in my book

[DaddyTorgo]

lunch

[DaddyTorgo]

doesn't make them a wolf. just...interesting is all *shrugs*

[st.cronin]

Originally Posted by Greyroofoo

maybe thomkal, but jackal and neon saving their skins doesn't make one a wolf in my book

While I agree with this it would be very frustrating for those of us trying to figure out who actually is a wolf.

[The Jackal]

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo

that would certainly raise eyebrows. linking yourself to the two of them is either risky or ballsy, or puts a big target on the three of you.

We honestly have nothing to do with each other, and I have no reason to suspect that either of them is bad (they could be, but there's nothing close to proof). I'm not really in favor of another day of no lynch, but if both of you switch, I will.

[Neon_Chaos]

Originally Posted by DaddyTorgo

that would certainly raise eyebrows. linking yourself to the two of them is either risky or ballsy, or puts a big target on the three of you.

Seems like Jackal up and left, though. So the idea is moot.

[Neon_Chaos]

Oh wait, he's back.

[Greyroofoo]

anyways vote jackal

I got 4 minutes before I get back to work if anone wants to persuade me why this is bad

[Greyroofoo]

anyone*

[Alan T]

Originally Posted by st.cronin

While I agree with this it would be very frustrating for those of us trying to figure out who actually is a wolf.

My bet is none of the three are a wolf.

[Neon_Chaos]

Thomkal, what do you think?