Front Office Football Central  

Go Back   Front Office Football Central > Main Forums > Werewolf Games
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Mark Forums Read Statistics

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-08-2007, 05:11 PM   #601
Jonathan Ezarik
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Bossier City, LA
I'm probably doing what I always do in these games: overanalyze everything.
Jonathan Ezarik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 05:12 PM   #602
ntndeacon
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Alabama
Quote:
Originally Posted by path12 View Post

A. Greater Werewolvia: 33 points,
B. Middle Werewolvia: 14 points,
C. Lesser Werewolvia: 20 points, $3
D. Fleabit Cove: 11 points, $2
E. Dogbonia: 10 points,
F. Dog Ear: 12 points,
G. Homidia: 15 points, $3
H. Lupinia: 16 points, $3
I. Garouvia: 25 points, $3
J. North Canis: 17 points, $3
K. Lake Wolfsbane: 18 points, $3
L. South Canis: 29 points, $3
M. Lower Fang: 23 points, $3
N. Upper Fang: 21 points, $3
O. Alpovia: 13 points,


But I think this at least gives us some data for discussion.

the above is at least one attempt to put out there a possibility.
ntndeacon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 05:15 PM   #603
ntndeacon
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Alabama
by the way those are monetary numbers not paths.
ntndeacon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 05:19 PM   #604
path12
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by ntndeacon View Post
the above is at least one attempt to put out there a possibility.

I would quibble and try to grab the two fang props with $4 and leave out the $2 bid........but I think that is not an unreasonable strategy overall. I certainly like that idea better than a bunch of $2 bids.

My personal leaning right now is more along the line of 5-6 on 6 props, but that probably could be riskier. There is also a certain lure to the big bids on the top two or three just because it's so obvious that it. just. might. work!!!
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
path12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 05:23 PM   #605
ntndeacon
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Alabama
how about tossing an extra buck on say Lower fang and then keep a buck on Middle Werewolvia then as a comprimise?
ntndeacon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 05:32 PM   #606
Jonathan Ezarik
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Bossier City, LA
Quote:
Originally Posted by path12 View Post
My personal leaning right now is more along the line of 5-6 on 6 props, but that probably could be riskier. There is also a certain lure to the big bids on the top two or three just because it's so obvious that it. just. might. work!!!

What are the six properties you would go after?
Jonathan Ezarik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 05:33 PM   #607
path12
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Ntn, you seem more sure that this is the way to go than some of the other strategies that have been tossed around. I'm just curious as to why?

My fear about this strategy is that bottom feeding may be one of the more popular ways to go among some of the other tribes.
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
path12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 05:33 PM   #608
ntndeacon
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Alabama
Hey Iam gonna step out for a while and go feed myself. I will be back prob during Survivor.
ntndeacon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 05:35 PM   #609
Marathoner
High School JV
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by path12 View Post
I would quibble and try to grab the two fang props with $4 and leave out the $2 bid........but I think that is not an unreasonable strategy overall. I certainly like that idea better than a bunch of $2 bids.

My personal leaning right now is more along the line of 5-6 on 6 props, but that probably could be riskier. There is also a certain lure to the big bids on the top two or three just because it's so obvious that it. just. might. work!!!

Interesting thought, maybe also drop out a $3 bet on one of the middle value properties and increase the bid on a higher value one.
Marathoner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 05:38 PM   #610
ntndeacon
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Alabama
Basically, path. I feel that I feel that several of the groups are going to go after the big categories as a kinda reverse psychology game. some may be willing to lose 15 bucks to have a token bid on everything and use the rest on big items. but the more they spend on individual items the less they have on others.
Certainly it could be a losing strategy. but I think there is going to be a fair amount of ties on big values
ntndeacon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 05:38 PM   #611
ntndeacon
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Alabama
be back about 7ish
ntndeacon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 05:41 PM   #612
path12
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonathan Ezarik View Post
What are the six properties you would go after?

Oh-oh. Now I've done it. It's far easier to talk in the abstract, isn't it?

Hmmmmm. OK. To flesh out that idea, I would probably lean towards this in point level order:

M. Lower Fang - 23 - $6
N. Upper Fang - 21 - $5
H. Lupinia - 16 - $5
G. Homidia - 15 - $5
B. Middle Werewolvia - 14 - $4
O. Alpovia - 13 - $4

That's 102 points in play for our 29 bucks. If we get four we're in pretty good shape.
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
path12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 05:43 PM   #613
path12
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by ntndeacon View Post
Basically, path. I feel that I feel that several of the groups are going to go after the big categories as a kinda reverse psychology game. some may be willing to lose 15 bucks to have a token bid on everything and use the rest on big items. but the more they spend on individual items the less they have on others.
Certainly it could be a losing strategy. but I think there is going to be a fair amount of ties on big values


I think that's a valid viewpoint. I want to ponder that a bit.
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
path12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 05:46 PM   #614
Jonathan Ezarik
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Bossier City, LA
Quote:
Originally Posted by path12 View Post
Oh-oh. Now I've done it. It's far easier to talk in the abstract, isn't it?

Hmmmmm. OK. To flesh out that idea, I would probably lean towards this in point level order:

M. Lower Fang - 23 - $6
N. Upper Fang - 21 - $5
H. Lupinia - 16 - $5
G. Homidia - 15 - $5
B. Middle Werewolvia - 14 - $4
O. Alpovia - 13 - $4

That's 102 points in play for our 29 bucks. If we get four we're in pretty good shape.

That's not a bad selection. Safe and in the middle. If the other tribes go all out either way (going after a select few or spreading themselves across all), this would work out for us.
Jonathan Ezarik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 05:53 PM   #615
path12
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonathan Ezarik View Post
That's not a bad selection. Safe and in the middle. If the other tribes go all out either way (going after a select few or spreading themselves across all), this would work out for us.

Thinking about it I'd probably tweak it a bit by making the bottom two $3 bids and using those two dollars on each of the top two.
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
path12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 05:54 PM   #616
Jonathan Ezarik
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Bossier City, LA
I'm going to be leaving soon and I hope to be back before the deadline, but there's a chance I won't be. I really have no strong feelings for this challenge, so whatever you guys decide to go with is fine by me.
Jonathan Ezarik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 05:57 PM   #617
Jonathan Ezarik
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Bossier City, LA
Quote:
Originally Posted by path12 View Post
Thinking about it I'd probably tweak it a bit by making the bottom two $3 bids and using those two dollars on each of the top two.

That makes sense. I don't see anyone bidding more than $3 for Middle Werewolvia and Alpovia.
Jonathan Ezarik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 06:03 PM   #618
path12
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
So you'd be fine with either a spread out strategy or a more focused middle strategy? What's your feeling on the big splurge?
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
path12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 06:07 PM   #619
Jonathan Ezarik
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Bossier City, LA
I favor a middle focused strategy over a spread out one. I'm not sure what I think of a big splurge. It's risky, but it might work. But if everyone is not behind it, I think we should go in the middle.
Jonathan Ezarik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 06:12 PM   #620
Jonathan Ezarik
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Bossier City, LA
And now I'm out. Good luck guys if I don't make it back in time.
Jonathan Ezarik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 06:29 PM   #621
path12
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
I'll be heading out in a few also, but should be back by 9:30 Eastern or so.
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
path12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 07:03 PM   #622
Marathoner
High School JV
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Works been damn busy tonight, hopefully will be back on about 9:30 for my 2 cents.
Marathoner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 07:58 PM   #623
ntndeacon
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Alabama
snDvls seemed to let this slip.

Barkeep - Helsing's bids are
$5 for Lesser Werewolvia
$5 for Fleabit Cove
$2 for Dogbonia
$2 for Dog Ear
$2 for Garouvia
$1 for North Canis
$1 for Lake Wolfsbane
$10 for South Canis
$1 for Alpovia

if you have any questions I'll be back later being that I'm on the west coast or one of my teammates can help you out.
ntndeacon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 08:00 PM   #624
ntndeacon
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Alabama
do y'all think that was a mistake or a canny attempt to scare people off the South Canis?
ntndeacon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 08:12 PM   #625
Marathoner
High School JV
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by ntndeacon View Post
do y'all think that was a mistake or a canny attempt to scare people off the South Canis?

My thought it was a deliberate move. But it would be easy to overthink this.
Marathoner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 08:17 PM   #626
path12
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
I am going to have to go to dinner very soon and will probably be back but close to deadline.. You guys know my thinking and preference, but the important thing is to have a strategy that all of us agree with. If you decide to do a spread out that's cool, but I'd certainly keep $3 minimums in mind. I guess we're going to have to finalize this in the next 45 minutes.
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
path12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 08:19 PM   #627
path12
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
looks like Helsing was along the lines we had thought. We would kick ass against those bids.
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
path12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 08:22 PM   #628
ntndeacon
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Alabama
Quote:
Originally Posted by path12 View Post
Oh-oh. Now I've done it. It's far easier to talk in the abstract, isn't it?

Hmmmmm. OK. To flesh out that idea, I would probably lean towards this in point level order:

M. Lower Fang - 23 - $6
N. Upper Fang - 21 - $5
H. Lupinia - 16 - $5
G. Homidia - 15 - $5
B. Middle Werewolvia - 14 - $4
O. Alpovia - 13 - $4

That's 102 points in play for our 29 bucks. If we get four we're in pretty good shape.

how about if we slice 1 off of H, B, and O to make a play at either $3 on I Garouvia (23 pts) or on C Lower Werewolvia (20 pts)

I would prefer I but am flexible
ntndeacon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 08:23 PM   #629
ntndeacon
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Alabama
sorry I did not see their 5 buck bid on Lesser WW
ntndeacon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 08:23 PM   #630
ntndeacon
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Alabama
what do you think path?
ntndeacon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 08:26 PM   #631
path12
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
I'm OK with that.
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
path12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 08:27 PM   #632
path12
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Just checking Garouvia and the rest of the list real quick.
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
path12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 08:28 PM   #633
ntndeacon
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Alabama
do you want me to put it in or should we wait for Marathoner?
(I think JE wasnt gonna be back in time)
ntndeacon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 08:29 PM   #634
ntndeacon
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Alabama
my bad Garouvia is 25 pts
ntndeacon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 08:30 PM   #635
path12
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
I don't have a problem with the idea of dropping Middle and Alpovia to $3 at all. I think I'd rather drop G down from $5 to $4 since it is one less point than Lupinia. I'm not sure that $3 is going to get us a 20 point area but I'm willing to take the risk if you are.
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
path12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 08:32 PM   #636
path12
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Barkeep, I know I can find this in thread somewhere but since you're here -- is it just last place that tribals in this challenge? Or is there no council involved? I get confused, sorry.
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
path12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 08:33 PM   #637
Jonathan Ezarik
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Bossier City, LA
I'm back.
Jonathan Ezarik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 08:34 PM   #638
path12
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Or just as an alternative to Garouvia, there's Lk Wolfbane with 18.
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
path12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 08:35 PM   #639
path12
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Marathoner and JE, what do you think of ntn's proposal?
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
path12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 08:36 PM   #640
ntndeacon
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Alabama
sure path we can drop G down instead.

I do think it is a worthwhile risk. will it be successful? dunno, but it is a gamble that could win it for us.
ntndeacon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 08:36 PM   #641
Barkeep49
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Not too far away
Quote:
Originally Posted by path12 View Post
Barkeep, I know I can find this in thread somewhere but since you're here -- is it just last place that tribals in this challenge? Or is there no council involved? I get confused, sorry.
Last place tribe goes to tribal council. First place gets goodies. Middle two neither go to tribal nor get goodies.
Barkeep49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 08:37 PM   #642
ntndeacon
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Alabama
those extra 7 are very tempting though
and Ithink there may be a thought by folks that they wont beable to aford too many of the higher properties.
ntndeacon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 08:37 PM   #643
path12
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by ntndeacon View Post
sure path we can drop G down instead.

I do think it is a worthwhile risk. will it be successful? dunno, but it is a gamble that could win it for us.

I agree. We're mostly playing the safe middle, I think we have room for a bit more risk in the initial layout.
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
path12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 08:39 PM   #644
Jonathan Ezarik
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Bossier City, LA
Quote:
Originally Posted by path12 View Post
Marathoner and JE, what do you think of ntn's proposal?

What is it?
Jonathan Ezarik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 08:40 PM   #645
path12
Coordinator
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
OK, to recap the revised proposal:

M. Lower Fang - 23 - $6
N. Upper Fang - 21 - $5
H. Lupinia - 16 - $5
G. Homidia - 15 - $4
B. Middle Werewolvia - 14 - $3
O. Alpovia - 13 - $3
I. Garouvia - 25 - $3

That's $29 and 127 points in play.
__________________
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
path12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 08:42 PM   #646
ntndeacon
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Alabama
M. Lower Fang - 23 - $6
N. Upper Fang - 21 - $5
H. Lupinia - 16 - $5
G. Homidia - 15 - $4
B. Middle Werewolvia - 14 - $3
O. Alpovia - 13 - $3
I. Garouvia -25-$3
ntndeacon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 08:42 PM   #647
Marathoner
High School JV
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by ntndeacon View Post
do you want me to put it in or should we wait for Marathoner?
(I think JE wasnt gonna be back in time)

I'm good with that
Marathoner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 08:42 PM   #648
ntndeacon
Pro Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Alabama
Jon? how bout you?
ntndeacon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 08:43 PM   #649
Jonathan Ezarik
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Bossier City, LA
I don't like it. At all.
Jonathan Ezarik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2007, 08:43 PM   #650
Jonathan Ezarik
College Benchwarmer
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Bossier City, LA
Just kidding.

Looks good to me.
Jonathan Ezarik is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:39 PM.



Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.